To: 2timothy3.16
The problem is not the question, but the answers. I contend that anyone who thinks that Lott should "Stay on as Majority leader and make life for the leftist impossible" is being shortsighted.
Lott, as majority leader, would not make life impossible for the leftist. He makes life impossible for the conservative movement (which is NOT a racist movement, but will be described as such).
To: InspiredPath1
He makes life impossible for the conservative movement (which is NOT a racist movement, but will be described as such). So what's new here? The GOP won big in November because people are getting tired of this PC crap being spouted by the left. Lott's mistake was in apologizing at all, he should have laughed in the face of his accusers.
To: InspiredPath1
The problem is not the question, but the answers. I contend that anyone who thinks that Lott should "Stay on as Majority leader and make life for the leftist impossible" is being shortsighted. Nope, I have 20/20 vision thank you.
Or is it that you mean that anyone who doesn't agree with you has no foresight?
To: InspiredPath1
"Stay on as Majority leader and make life for the leftist impossible"Based on his past record -- you know, the one he had before he created this absolute disaster -- I'd say that is HIGHLY unlikely.
63 posted on
12/14/2002 3:46:44 PM PST by
Howlin
To: InspiredPath1
If Lott DOESN'T wind up resiging, he'll certainly be obliged to do a song-and-dance for the rest of his term,
and be yet more neutered even than he was before. If he DOES
have to resign ("for the good of the party") his replacement will be a virtual Democrat, the other face of
Nancy Pelosi. Lott's fate, one way or the other, of course, is the ultimate payment Republicans should expect by now to be getting in perpetuity
for ALREADY being too accommodating to the Democrats.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson