Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott Should Go-A bad Majority Leader gets worse.
The National Review ^ | December 13, 2002 | By National Review Editors

Posted on 12/13/2002 8:05:24 AM PST by Kay Soze

December 13, 2002, 10:00 a.m. Lott Should Go A bad Majority Leader gets worse.

By NR Editors

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott "has proven himself better suited to the back bench, where he is at least a generally reliable conservative vote. And there is an alternative in Oklahoma Sen. Don Nickles . . . Conservatives should encourage Nickles to make the — admittedly risky — challenge against Lott."

Thus wrote National Review in November 1998 after the GOP midterm disaster that year. We have long considered Lott a clumsy and ineffective Republican leader, and his controversial Strom Thurmond birthday remarks are a spectacular confirmation of that judgment. Is Lott a racist? We don't think so. Are many of the attacks on him dishonest and opportunistic? Yes. But he has been a poor leader of Senate Republicans, and the latest gaffe will only further erode his standing and his ability to lead.

Lott stands to become the most unpopular congressional Republican since Newt Gingrich. That alone shouldn't be disqualifying (and NR defended Gingrich from most of the charges hurled at him). Consider, however, the comparison: Gingrich became a reviled public figure who had won a historic victory in 1994 and possessed an active (sometimes overactive) political imagination. Lott will be a reviled public figure who is a sub-par Majority Leader, period.

NR tries to make its practical political judgments based on what is best for the conservative cause. The advantage of maintaining Lott as Majority Leader as opposed to any number of his colleagues — not just Nickles, but Jon Kyl, Mitch McConnell, Rick Santorum — is nil. He can only be a drag. Conservatives should be able to argue for constitutionalist judges, race-blind governmental policies, tighter immigration laws, welfare reform, and limited government generally without the dead weight of a Senate Majority Leader who has created a cloud over himself and his party through his own thoughtlessness.

It will no doubt be difficult for Lott's colleagues, who are his friends, to force him out of his job. That's why Lott should realize the damage he has done to his party, and step aside. Failing that, the White House, with a broader political perspective than that of the members of the Senate club, should urge him to relinquish his leadership position.

Minority leader Tom Daschle's initial reaction (prior to his mauling by the Congressional Black Caucus) to Lott's remarks was essentially sound — Lott misspoke. But Lott misspoke in a particular way, one freighted with symbolic significance. Many southern whites of a certain generation have a shameful past on civil-rights issues. This doesn't necessarily make them reprehensible people, or mean that they are racists today. But, when they are public figures, it is reasonable to expect from them an honest reckoning with their past, and, of course, an awareness that a reckoning is necessary.

Many conservatives will be tempted to defend Lott because of the nature of some of the attacks on him. It's an understandable impulse. But it is possible for someone simultaneously to suffer unfair attacks, handle himself and his predicament poorly, and be an underwhelming political figure. Trent Lott has managed a trifecta. For NR to rally to his side now would amount to defending him because he is being accused of racism.

We usually pride ourselves on being fair-weather critics of, and foul-weather friends to, conservative politicians. Lott is in for a long bout of foul weather. But we can't be loyal to a Majority Leader who we didn't support in the first place.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; lott; senateleader; trentlott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Time magazine reported on its Web site that Lott led a battle in the early 1960s that kept blacks out of his college fraternity, Sigma Nu.

"The Congressional Black Caucus urged the Senate to censure Lott. The group called it "astounding" that Bush did not want him to step down.- USA Today 12/13/02

""If Senator Lott can provide a satisfactory explanation for his statement, this entire episode should be forgotten," Bennett said in a statement released Thursday. "If he cannot, he needs to step down as the Senate majority leader." William Bennet

The president's strong statement suggests that Lott has failed to quell the controversy over his comments, which some conservatives complain have opened the GOP to charges of racial bigotry. On Thursday, the Congressional Black Caucus -- comprised of black Democratic lawmakers -- released a statement calling for a "formal censure of Sen. Lott's racist remarks." CNN 12/13/02

"Considering Bush directly addressed the controversy--in strong tones to a multiracial crowd--underscores how serious Republicans are taking the incident. Bush received only 9 percent of the black vote in the 2000 campaign, despite his strong attempts to court African-Americans, and administration officials feared that the flap could set back GOP attempts to woo minority voters."- Chicago tribune 12/13/02

1 posted on 12/13/2002 8:05:24 AM PST by Kay Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Is this Bill F. Buckley talking, he is still 'editor at large..'
2 posted on 12/13/2002 8:08:04 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Stay focused on the game, people. This isn't about Trent Lott, it's about which party controls the U.S. Senate when it reconvenes in January. Right now the split is 51-49; if the Democrats can force Lott to resign as majority leader, and do it in a way so humiliating that he resigns his Senate seat as well, then Lott's replacement will be appointed by Ron Musgrave, the 4-term Democrat governor of Mississippi.

And if you believe Musgrave will appoint a Republican to fill Lott's seat, I've got some DNR-protected wetlands I'd like to sell you.

The sudden appearance of stories about Lott's racist activities as a college frat boy has as much credibility as the sudden appearance of Linda Tripp's shoplifting arrest record. This whole sorry mess is a political hit job, pure and simple, and the fingerprints of Terry McAuliffe, James Carville, and Hillary Clinton are all over this one.

3 posted on 12/13/2002 8:09:11 AM PST by brbethke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
YUP.....the dem mob has been busy.....
4 posted on 12/13/2002 8:10:48 AM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
Haley Barbour for Mississippi Governor 2003!
5 posted on 12/13/2002 8:11:14 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
Right now the split is 51-49..."

Are you sure? I thought is was 51-48-1 Republican.

6 posted on 12/13/2002 8:12:17 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
It's Musgrove. Musgrave is our new congresschick from Colorado.
7 posted on 12/13/2002 8:13:53 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
This whole sorry mess is a political hit job, pure and simple, and the fingerprints of Terry McAuliffe, James Carville, and Hillary Clinton are all over this one.

Perhaps, but don't forget who started it. Trent Lott himself, with his comments - a clip of which I saw last night, by the way, on MSNBC, and he sure didn't look like he was kidding to me. He said it somberly and seriously. It's damning, is what it is.. I'm surprised the media isn't running that clip a whole lot more. And what's worse, he's said the same thing before. The man is a loose cannon, and he's most likely in denial of how reprehensible the segregationist past really was. Sure, the Democrats may be piling on him now to utterly humiliate him, but none of this would have happened had Lott not given them the material they need to do so.

8 posted on 12/13/2002 8:15:30 AM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ewing
WAKE UP GOP THE ATTACK ON LOTT IS ALL ABOUT THE BANNING OF PB ABORTION ITS COMING FROM NOW
Now has had it in for Lott since the second week of November and are using african americans to stop Lott from banning PB abortion. Fact! .....more to come

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/805860/posts
9 posted on 12/13/2002 8:15:30 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
if the Democrats can force Lott to resign as majority leader, and do it in a way so humiliating that he resigns his Senate seat as well,

That's a big, big if. I don't live in Mississippi, so I have no say in who they choose to be their senator, but I imagine Lott would win re-election handily if he chose to run again. But Lott is also the Majority Leader, and therefore a signficant leader in the political party I belong to, and I don't think someone with his repeated poor judgement, both from racial issues and political ones, belongs in this post. He simply causes far too much damage to the conservative movement, something you expect from your enemies, not your leaders.

10 posted on 12/13/2002 8:16:47 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
Even more likely than Lott's resignation from the Senate (which ain't gonna happen because it would rule out any lobbying jobs for him), is that, if Lott stays, the firestorm will become so terrible that Chafee and McCain will walk and the Senate will be lost anyway.
11 posted on 12/13/2002 8:17:33 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
Sure, the Democrats may be piling on him now to utterly humiliate him, but none of this would have happened had Lott not given them the material they need to do so.

Yep. As Clarence Thomas once said, don't give your enemies the hammer to hit you with.

12 posted on 12/13/2002 8:17:53 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Candygram... Landshark.
13 posted on 12/13/2002 8:19:25 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
You are right. It's a total political hit job. They are going after Lott like they did Gingrich. It's the politics of personal destruction, a la Clinton and gang, and it's disgusting. However, Lott teed up this mess with his stupid comments. I've never liked Lott and really hate to see him beaten and bloodied by the press and the Congressional Black Caucus but if we can replace him - as Majority Leader - with Rick Santorum or Mitch McConnell or Nickles, then I say go for it.

He better stay in his seat though!

14 posted on 12/13/2002 8:19:30 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
One question that should be asked is if Strom Thurmond only ran for President on a single issue of segregation. It seems unlikely that he didn't have other issues to discuss. On segregation issues, he is probably no different than Senator Byrd. Through the years, he has been conservative whereas Byrd took the liberal route. Although I don't like Vacant's leadership, the man deserves consideration for the one-issue attack on his statements. I think that a goodly part of the criticism stems from his conservative tendency.
15 posted on 12/13/2002 8:19:54 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
if Lott stays, the firestorm will become so terrible that Chafee and McCain will walk and the Senate will be lost anyway.

I think that the GOP will quietly tell the Dems that Byrd and Hollings will be in play if they try to go further than call for Lott to resign as Majority Leader. And the Dems ain't stupid - they know that Byrd is far more vulnerable to the bigot charge, and they don't control the flow of political information any more, so the GOP can inflict some damage with this particular stick as well.

16 posted on 12/13/2002 8:20:05 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
Usually when people say things somberly and seriously (on multiple occassions) we take those words at face value. Many here at FR just don't want to admit the awful truth that Lott is an unreconstructed bigot.
17 posted on 12/13/2002 8:21:32 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Exactly right! If Lott resigns as majority leader, the GOP will be in an excellent position to play the Robert Byrd card. Unfortunately, it can't play that card now effectively.
18 posted on 12/13/2002 8:22:06 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
I remember a song sung by Sigma Nu frats in the 1960s which started "There'll never be a [N-word] Sigma Nu...."
19 posted on 12/13/2002 8:22:18 AM PST by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
The sudden appearance of stories about Lott's racist activities as a college frat boy has as much credibility as the sudden appearance of Linda Tripp's shoplifting arrest record. This whole sorry mess is a political hit job, pure and simple, and the fingerprints of Terry McAuliffe, James Carville, and Hillary Clinton are all over this one.

Not unlike the stories of Hillary!'s Black Panther-sympathiser past. Sauce for the goose...
20 posted on 12/13/2002 8:22:57 AM PST by Norman Conquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson