Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth

Suday Herald (UK) ^ | unknown | Sarah-Kate Templeton

[DAnconia55]

Gladly. Sexual intercourse is a divinly ordained act whose purpose is twofold: procreation and expression of love between man and wife. These two purposes are intimately joined by God, so it is a sin for man to separate them. Hence all methods of contraception, including Onanism, are wrong, as are all methods of sterilization.

Certain venereal diseases can cause madness. See a doctor.

[Sandy]

FMCDM

[general_re]

Is that an analogy of some sort?

I'm sorry, but I was just marveling at the apparent power of those I'm not big on being "judgemental" glasses you're wearing. It must be a little bit like Superman's cape - once they're in place, one can do some truly amazing things ;)

[stands2reason]

The reason I thought Lesbians is number 1. It say's that it is the same disease that cause's Cervical Cancer and 2. It effects women in most cases, not the men.

So that means I should feel sorry for you. FYI, you don't have to be a lesbian to give oral sex.

[Askel5]

I wish you'd point out where I've been judgmental so that I may apologize. It's certainly not my intention ever to be judgmental.

That said, it's also not my intention to damper my discerning or sacrifice clarity in some effort to appear "compassionate" and "tolerant" of all and sundry personal opinions or individual pursuits of happiness.

This is precisely the means by which the left cuts out our tongues as a rule.

I'm sick of it. I'm certainly not going to stand for it on the Casual Sex Threads.

(For, as you may know, it's my contention that our Enlightened and Liberated view of sex -- as primed by pedophile predators like Kinsey and specifically protected as "Free Speech" by our cunning Supreme Court -- is exactly the breakpoint at which they've not only enslaved us to our passions like dogs only too comfortable licking themselves in public but precipitated the myriad "Crises" to which they've offered us the magic cures of abortion, artificial conception, etc. etc.

My views on Men as ideally circumspect and Women as ideally modest are entirely my own but well-founded, I think, by any review of the empirical evidence that is human history, tradition, mores and faith ... much less the "liberation" obtained in the unleashing of Winged Eros and Free Love in the French and Bolshevik revolutions as well as Weimar Germany.)

[general_re]

LOL. I would never do anything to cause you to become circumspect in your posts - to do so would be to kill the Askel we know and love. Suffice it to say, instead, that I merely think you are overreacting to what is nothing more than the cyberspace equivalent of water-cooler banter - I highly doubt that anyone intends the posts you object to so strenuously to be read as literally or taken as seriously as you are doing.

Whether we measure up to the ideals of the past is neither here nor there - until you have a working Wayback machine, we're here and you're stuck with us. You'll only give yourself ulcers if you insist on bending the world and the people in it to fit your notion of the ideal Man. ;)

[HELLRAISER II]

Oh thank you, I never would have figured that out without your help.

[MitchellC]

Hmmm wonder if the FR Taliban knows it's ok to have sex with your Slave Girls... according to the OT, at least...

You must have misread something.

[Coleus]

And Multiple Sex Partners leads to increased cancer of the cervix. Bad behavior can be deadly.