It's pitiful when art equals pretentious stupidity.
Regards, Ivan
It's pitiful when art equals pretentious stupidity.
Regards, Ivan
Monday 25 October 1999Tate protesters wreck artist’s unmade bed
By Sam Wallace
TRACEY EMIN’S work My Bed, shortlisted for the Turner Prize, was attacked yesterday by two men who repeatedly jumped on it and drank from the bottles of vodka which form part of the Tate Gallery exhibit.
The men, naked from the waist up with Chinese characters painted on their chests, were wrestled to the ground by curators and a member of the public. A visitor said: “Everyone at the exhibition started clapping as they thought it was part of the show. At first, the security people didn’t know what to do.”
Police later released two men without charge. Yuan Cai, 43, from Stoke Newington, north London, said he had planned the action because the first time he saw Emin’s work he thought it was strong but still institutionalised.
He said: “We want to push the idea further. Our action will make the public think about what is good art or bad art. We didn’t have time to do a proper performance. I thought I should touch the bed and smell the bed.”
Mr Cai, a correspondent for Chinese arts magazines and newspapers, had words such as “Communism”, “Anti-Stuckism”, “Freedom”, “Idealism” and “Internationalism” written on his body in Chinese as well as English. He said his actions were themselves a piece of art named “Two Naked Men Jump Into Tracey’s Bed”. Although he was not a contemporary of Emin, Mr Cai confirmed that he was a student of the Royal College of Art, from where he graduated in 1991. He had also gained a BA from Maidstone College.
J J Xi, 37, from Camden Town, said he wanted to push the work, which was not interesting enough, further to make it more significant and sensational. The words on his body included “Optimism”, “Idealism” and “Anarchism”.
Mr Xi, a graduate of Goldsmiths College, University of London, said: “I had three security guards on top of me. I think the way they treated us visual artists was ignorant. We are planning more demonstrations but we would prefer to keep them secret.”
The Tate later confirmed that “an incident” had taken place, but said that the artwork would be back on display. He said: “The work has now been restored and the exhibition will open to the public as usual at 10am tomorrow.” The spokesman refused to discuss what had been done to “restore” it.
© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 1999.
She should have provided the Tate with a real, traditional tree, as that would be the most unexpected thing to do, but, of course, she's bound by the conventions of being unconventional.
The dead mouse gurl had a nice speech about why it was art and its "message."
I have become convinced that most modern art has nothing to do with talent and everything to do with the spiel that the artist uses to accompany it.
In that manner, one with a glib tongue could produce a piece of art with Jim Trafficant's hairpiece or Hillary's ubiquitous pantsuit.
At any rate, this is not art, and the sooner insecure monied people learn to speak out and invest in something with actual talent behind it, the quicker the market for these charlatans will collapse.