Posted on 12/11/2002 5:05:43 AM PST by SJackson
Actors Mike Farrell, Matt Damon and Martin Sheen do not want the United States to go to war with Iraq.
Therefore, along with 97 other celebrities, they have formed a group called Artists United to Win Without War.
What the public didn't see at their Tuesday press conference is far more significant than the formation of yet another peace coalition by a bunch of left-leaning celebrities like Jessica Lange, Anjelica Huston and Elliott Gould.
What that significant development is, is the healthy dose of skepticism displayed by the mainstream press at Tuesdays well-covered Hollywood event.
But first, the groups statement, scheduled to appear soon in select newspapers:
"War talk in Washington is alarming and unnecessary.
"We are patriotic Americans who share the belief that Saddam Hussein cannot be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction. We support rigorous United Nations weapons inspections to assure Iraqs effective disarmament.
"However, a preemptive military invasion of Iraq will harm American national interests. Such a war will increase human suffering, arouse animosity toward our country, increase the likelihood of terrorist attacks, damage the economy, and undermine our moral standing in the world. It will make us less, not more, secure.
"We reject the doctrine a reversal of long-held American tradition that our country, alone, has the right to launch first-strike attacks.
"The valid U.S. and U.N. objective of disarming Saddam Hussein can be achieved through legal diplomatic means. There is no need for war. Let us instead devote our resources to improving the security and well-being of people here at home and around the world."
Now for the significance.
An NBC reporter immediately set a skeptical tone for the spirited question and answer session, asking group co-chair Farrell if Artists United to Win Without War isnt made up of celebrities who were also against the Gulf War a decade ago. Wouldnt the world be an even more dangerous place if Hussein was not ousted from Kuwait and U.N inspectors werent brought in to Iraq back then?
The deft former star of M*A*S*H* said he would have preferred it had the elder President Bush explored "options short of war" before expelling Hussein from Kuwait.
Then Sheen was asked by a couple of reporters why it is that President Bush would threaten war against Iraq if Hussein presented little or no threat to the U.S.
"I dont know if well ever get the whole truth from this administration about anything," he answered.
Pressed again as to the presidents motives, Sheen attributed them to mere family pride. "I think hed like to hand his father Saddam Husseins head," Sheen said.
Then there was this exchange between a reporter and Sheen:
"Would you like to see Saddam Hussein overthrown?" the reporter asked.
"I dont know what you mean," Sheen answered.
"Removed from power," said the reporter.
"I dont even know what that means," Sheen said.
The undaunted reporter pressed on. "Regime change," he explained.
"Id like to see that come from the Iraqis, not the Americans," Sheen finally conceded.
Not wanting the other reporters to have all the fun, I asked if, assuming our military were to overthrow Hussein quickly and with few casualties, and then Iraqi citizens were shown dancing in the streets and praising America for liberating them from a torturous dictator, would the Artists United to Win Without War rethink their position? Would they consider they might be wrong, and say so publicly?
Sheen offered, "Im always open to the possibility that Im wrong."
The bulk of the answer, though, came from Farrell, who made the point that, just because some Iraqis might applaud such a removal of Hussein, doesnt make it the right thing to do.
"The idea that somehow the end justifies the means, as youre suggesting, is exactly contrary to the principles on which this country was founded," Farrell said.
"The idea you suggest, forgive me, is an inappropriate one," he scolded.
The best bit of levity came at the close of the hour-long event. It had been suggested by some of the dozen celebrities in attendance that Artists United to Win Without War was nonpartisan.
Asked to name a Republican among the group, Farrell claimed there were some, but quipped, "I dont want to out them."
In a room full of skeptical reporters who clearly were not there to rubber-stamp Hollywoods latest political effort, the very revealing joke went over quite well.
Now I understand how he got the name BJ.
Ditto
Thank you!
(...and if you want to get real fussy about it, they are most accurately described as 'hard core, unrepentant neo-Stalinists'.)
Tell me about it. Bleached blondes with their lips and breasts full of silicone--but who at least have the sense to keep their mouths shut about things they don't understand--are actually beginning to earn a few points from me after hearing the "serious" actors speak out.
What a joke. What "art" have these professional fakers ever created? That's the problem with language inflation; once you begin calling the garbage man a "sanitation engineer," he thinks people are actually interested in his opinion.
Oh, he was. His name was Benedict Arnold.
I think all these guys have played this card one too many times. "Weren't you against the Gulf War, too?" is a very telling question. The other day, in New York, Daniel Ellsburg was arrested protesting against the war. I'm sorry, but I've seen this movie and this is where I came in. It's the same clowns every time, they are never on the side of America in anything, and this has been going on for thirty years. They have some kind of death wish for their own country. That's their problem; I don't need to make it mine. Never mind their arguments about this war or that one... they are always against whatever we're going to do. They have all become tiresome nags. To Hell with them. |
I can't find a website for these guys. I would love to see a list of the clymers who signed the petition, or whatever they want to call it.
They are looking for publicity. I work in Hollywood, I know these types. It's all about a career move.
She really ticked me off. She's struck me as the typical brainwashed product of a liberal university.
OK.
Looking for 99 other people to form the new group "Normal People United to Win the War Whatever it takes"...
We can write letters too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.