Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
"We could have avoided this suit if he had just avoided the wetlands area."

Here's the crux of it ding dong. Is it his land or not ? Where is the Constitutional power granted to the Army Corps of Engineers defined ? Article 1, 2 or 3 or ?

5 posted on 12/10/2002 8:08:34 PM PST by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lawdog
I doubt very seriously he did the plowing during the winter, when the area was wet. Where I grew up in LA (Lower Alabama) a weeks worth of rain would be enough to keep tractors out of the fields.

Given that, I think some of this is driven by a liberal definition of "wetlands" based on the current Chief of Engineers' over the top devotion to "the environment".

9 posted on 12/10/2002 8:17:07 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: lawdog
Remember the debate from late in the Clinton administration? They claimed that the Feds had jurisdiction over any puddle of water that a migratory bird could possibly land in. They included mud puddles formed after rainstorms as "wetlands."
11 posted on 12/10/2002 8:18:57 PM PST by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: lawdog
Remember the debate from late in the Clinton administration? They claimed that the Feds had jurisdiction over any puddle of water that a migratory bird could possibly land in. They included mud puddles formed after rainstorms as "wetlands."
12 posted on 12/10/2002 8:18:58 PM PST by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson