Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
In the meantime on this question of the union and its nature, I'll happily yield to Alexis de Tocqueville...

Who I am sure would be glad to yield to Chief Justice Marhall:

"...there is certainly nothing in the circumstances under which our constitution was formed; nothing in the history of the times, which justify the opinion that the confidence reposed in the states was so implicit as to leave in them and their tribunals the power of resisting or defeating, in the form of law, the legislative measures of the Union."

Walt

38 posted on 12/10/2002 11:55:23 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Who I am sure would be glad to yield to Chief Justice Marhall:

It is interesting you hold John Marshall in such high esteem with this matter, considering your dismissal of him when he contradicts you and The Lincoln on habeas corpus. That being noted, I'll permit him to yield to Thomas Jefferson:

"The future inhabitants of the Atlantic & Missipi States will be our sons. We leave them in distinct but bordering establishments. We think we see their happiness in their union, & we wish it. Events may prove it otherwise; and if they see their interest in separation, why should we take side with our Atlantic rather than our Missipi descendants? It is the elder and the younger son differing. God bless them both, & keep them in union, if it be for their good, but separate them, if it be better." - Letter to John C. Breckinridge, August 12, 1803

41 posted on 12/10/2002 12:45:57 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson