Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
And FWIW, I don't hold much truck with "doctrinal thinking" of any description. Such thinking "filters" reality in such a way as to cut it down to our own size, so to speak. Filters are designed to omit parts of reality. That is their purpose. And to the extent that we depend on them, we may only succeed in achieving a false sense of security, based on an illusionary sense of knowledged "possessed".

While I agree with you to a certain extent that "doctrinal thinking" is limited to our finitude I would contend that revelation is necessarily 'knowledge possessed'.

Isn't the real problem our limitations of analysis?

111 posted on 12/09/2002 11:50:43 AM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: lockeliberty
I would contend that revelation is necessarily 'knowledge possessed'.

For the person who "gets it," I'd say, yes, definitely -- that is valid "knowledge possessed." But we only possess it because it is a free gift to us from its Source -- God. We can't "do it" all on our own. We can't "take heaven by storm." And the Spirit moves where it wilt....

113 posted on 12/09/2002 12:34:23 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson