Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
Where did Lott mention segregation?

He was suggesting that a Dixiecrat President Thurmond would have protected us from "all these problems over all these years."

Yeah, a segregationist President is exactly what we needed then. </sarcasm>
20 posted on 12/07/2002 5:31:12 AM PST by BillCompton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: BillCompton
I'm trying to recall,were many great strides against segregation made during the term of the winner of that election,1949-early 1953?
22 posted on 12/07/2002 5:36:05 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton
I think the issue is Lott pure and simple. He is not willing to fight/work for a core set of values. He wants to play things safe. He can't articulate values which he knows the press doesn't support. His feet are made of clay. He is the reason Clinton got away. He allowed Clinton to paint right wrong and wrong right. Goodbye Trent!
26 posted on 12/07/2002 5:39:35 AM PST by d.p.2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton
So you inferred he was talking about segregation.
32 posted on 12/07/2002 5:44:22 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson