[Grampa Dave]

You are right on target.

Eisner has decided to appeal to the 1% of the population, the homosexuals and the 10 to 20% of the general population who adore the homosexuals as a great Diversity life style.

Word has gotten out to the rest of us, the parents and Grandparents. The people with children and grandchildren, the rest of the population. The people that Disney used to target.

We have said no way and no to any Disney crapola. So we don't take our children/grandchildren to Disney movies or Disney Lands/Worlds or what ever has the Disney label on it.

Eisner is like the tv execs who keep bring back Ellen Degenerate and trying to run a new tv show on how great and funny being a homosexual is. The shows flop and never make it the full season.

Eisner and the left wing maggots in charge of the entertainment industry are so arrogant, they have refused to see what their love affair with the Gay Agenda has done to their business.

[reegs]

While the politics of Disney maybe hurting them, I see it more as a quality control issue. Disney is now releasing 2-3 full-length animated features a year. And, how many direct-to-video releases have you seen in the past year? Has to be over 5. It seems Disney is more concerned with quantity instead of quality.

A previous poster mentioned how the film would have fared better had they stuck with the original book. A great movie comes from a great story to tell, and people young and old recognize that. Obvious pandering with "solar surfboards" and other gimicky/trendy additions are a turn-off.

Disney needs to follow Pixar's model and produce one, very good movie every other year and not rush to the market with whatever shlock they have thrown together. With more and more competition for their entertainment dollars, consumers are increasingly picky over what to spend it on.