1 posted on
12/03/2002 9:31:46 PM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"We have to have a clear and strong national security stand."Yeah, but first you have to decide which nation you want to secure.
cc:Jim McDermott
David Bonior
Mark Thompson
To: kattracks; Vidalia
The intelligence of this toad never ceases to amaze.
Hey, Rapist Bill Clinton, this has been out long before you woke up this morning.
Your cocaine not "up to snuff" anymore?
Geez, when is Garry Trudeau gonna put a strip of the Impeached Arkansas Dog named Clinton (here boy, come fetch this brown paper bag...) into play, or is another illness gonna kill him again?
Actually, about the strip we care, the other we don't.
Sorry Jane... 2 posted on 12/04/2002 0:40 AM EST by Vidalia
To: kattracks
BLECH....BUGGER....PUKE.....BLLLEEEECCCHHHHHH.
To: kattracks
"You can reorganize all you want, but what are you doing to protect the tunnels, the bridges, the water systems, the utility systems?" he said. Well, first we'll bomb the crap out of the Al-Qaeda strongholds in Afghanistan, then we'll force the Taliban out of power, then we'll start turning the heat up on Sodom Hussein....getting the picture, Bubba?
To: *Clinton Haters
indexing
7 posted on
12/03/2002 10:06:20 PM PST by
Liz
To: kattracks
Mr. Clinton told Democrats in New York City that they could break through to the American public only if they directly confronted the issue of national security. He said the party should challenge Republicans on what he suggested was the administration's failure to spot signs of an impending attack before Sept. 11, and what he called a muddled response to the terrorism threat over the last year. EXCUSE ME???
Bring it on Fat Boy ... you want to talk about failures to spot signs??? ... Watch what you wish for .. you just might get it
Hey Fat Boy .. tell me .. What the hell did YOU do to stop 9/11 ..
9 posted on
12/03/2002 10:29:30 PM PST by
Mo1
To: kattracks
Mr. Clinton said the Republicans were benefiting from the support of an "increasingly right-wing and bellicose conservative press," which he contrasted with "an increasingly docile establishment press." "What was done to Tom Daschle was unconscionable, but our refusal to stand up and defend him in a disciplined way was worse," he said
an "increasingly right-wing and bellicose conservative press," ????
As for Dashole .. OH PLEASE
10 posted on
12/03/2002 10:37:55 PM PST by
Mo1
To: Howlin
FYI
12 posted on
12/03/2002 10:40:40 PM PST by
Mo1
To: Deb
Mr. Clinton... said the party should challenge Republicans on what he suggested was the administration's failure to spot signs of an impending attack before Sept. 11, and what he called a muddled response to the terrorism threat over the last year.
Seems our friend Bill doesn't think 9/11 was unaviodable.
To: kattracks
"They have a destruction machine. We don't have a destruction machine."He should have been heckled for this lie alone.
To: kattracks
Mr. Clinton said his party's candidates were too often perceived as weak in the face of the continuing threat from abroad. And just who was this broad?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson