Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theyknow
You can find "experts" to say anything.

Just as you can actually find "experts" that say there's nothing wrong with injecting mercury into little babies...

Words taken out of context are meaningless. Jonas Salk was a hero in our time, I shutter to think of his reaction to your distortion of his position

Er, his words WEREN'T out of context, as that is what he is quoted as saying in a 1977 Science magazine article. In fact, in 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 "Abstracts" )

In fact, how do you twist the following quote by Dr. Sabin, developer of the oral polio vaccine, as anything other than what he states?

"Official data have shown that the large-scale vaccinations undertaken in the US have failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection."
Dr A. Sabin, developer of the Oral Polio vaccine

IN FACT, here's a graphical representation of how vaccines WERE NOT responsibile for the decline in disease..

 

From GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE SHOWS VACCINES DIDN'T SAVE US

The above graphs, based on the official death numbers as recorded in the Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia, are taken from Greg Beattie's excellent book "Vaccination A Parent's Dilemma" and represent the decline in death rates from infectious disease in Australia. They clearly show that vaccines had nothing to do with the decline in death rates. (Note: Graphical evidence on the decline in death rates from infectious disease for USA, England, New Zealand and many other countries shows the exact same scenario as above).

So what were the true reasons for this decline? From his book 'Health and Healing' Dr Andrew Weil best answers it with this statement;

"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health. Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immunisations. In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc, were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water."

Here's a bit more info on the topic..

VACCINATION THE HIDDEN FACTS

What in the world do you think happened to small pox? Do you think that it only survives in laboratories is because humans wished it away?

It went away due to improved sanitation. You may want to read the following info..

From WHO SMALLPOX ERADICATION SUCCESS RECONSIDERED

In further examining this question from a longer historical perspective, it became readily apparent that the WHO claim did not at all square with the earlier data, i.e., historical smallpox eradication efforts. If we go back as far as the last century, we discover that Creighton's independent research findings as published in the Ninth Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, strongly contradict the effectiveness of mass smallpox immunization programs. A few revealing excerpts follow:
  • . . . in Bavaria in 1871 of 30,742 cases 29,429 were in vaccinated persons, or 95.7 percent.
  • Notwithstanding the fact that Prussia was the best re-vaccinated country in Europe, its mortality from smallpox in the epidemic of 1871 was higher (69,839) than any other Northern state.
  • According to a competent statistician (A. Vogt), the death-rate from smallpox in the German army, in which all recruits are re-vaccinated, was 60 percent more than among the civil population of the same age . . . although re-vaccination is not obligatory among the latter.
  • It is often alleged that the unvaccinated are so much inflammable material in the midst of the community, and that smallpox begins among them and gathers force so that it sweeps even the vaccinated before it. Inquiry into the facts has shown that at Cologne in 1870 the first unvaccinated person attacked by smallpox was the 174
th in order of time, at Bonn the same year the 42d, and at Liegnitz in 1871 the 225th.111

From HISTORICAL FACTS EXPOSING THE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES

- In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (The Hadwen Documents)


48 posted on 12/03/2002 1:22:27 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLurker
Just as you can actually find "experts" that say there's nothing wrong with injecting mercury into little babies... Mercury fumes are dangerous, mercury its self is not.
56 posted on 12/03/2002 3:47:47 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson