Posted on 12/02/2002 11:11:09 AM PST by Nov3
You almost have it. The fact is we know precious little about how changes in our low level brain chemistry affect moods and higher thoughts. All these tools are extremely blunt and imprecise especially the stronger ones used for severe brain illness. What clinical psychiatrists essentially do is supress (or sometimes enhance) certain brain activity in the hope that it changes certain thought patterns. Effectiveness is usually enhanced when the treatment is combined with a psychologist who helps the patient through the thought process changes. I believe that therapy should never be left out even with relatively weak drugs like Prozac.
But the most important fact of all is that many placebo patients undergo the same or similar low level brain chemistry changes that the drugs cause.
If belief is so important, why didn't I get better with Prozac? God knows I thought I would. But I didn't. Perhaps I should have tried harder?!?
Faith in medicine is intrinsic, you have it or you don't. If you don't, you can't "force" yourself to have it. However, you can develop faith in your own healing abilities, with medicine and without. That faith can only develop very slowly with substantial changes in lifestyle, work habits, etc. Diet is also very important but very slow to affect brain chemistry. There are no short cuts; Prozac is not a one step program.
You are right it is not a SSRI but both drugs raise the level of serotonin.
This is clearly different from a reuptake inhibitor, but the research I found was that Paxil (not Prozac) had the effect when taken in doses greater than the depression treatment level.
You really need to find out if the research was funded by one of the drug companies. Eli Lilly has a non-disclosure on all of their research. If it doesn't come out the way they want it, it never sees the light of day. Of course if you are a researcher and your research does not come out the way Eli-Lilly wants it to you don't get any more research! The published research may be skewed a little by this.
You may trust this research if you wish.
To make more money?????
Is it the prohibitive testing costs for finding any possible risk from a new drug?
Maybe it is just cheaper to hide known faults and falsify reseach.
The reason these drugs work for all these things is basically a placebo effect.
Yeah right.
I don't know the merits of these various lawsuits, but I do know that they are not generally used to punish wrongdoers. Usually the costs are passed to insurance companies, shareholders, and consumers.
The concept that people should stand by as others lives are destroyed for that moronic reason is so ridiculous it doesn't bear any further discussion.
Or, there may be some brains that are not as responsive to non-chemical intervention. There is the thought that children who have undergone trauma or serious long term stress when young have their brains almost hardwired along certain pathways.
I believe that there are also cases where giving up the drugs is not an option. Regardless, I agree that therapy is a necessary part of recovery. (Gosh that sounds so touhy-feely!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.