Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nicmarlo
And why was Safra restraining her? Let's go to post #2245 and read about it: The siblings’ court papers say an autopsy report disclosed “combat-like” marks on their mother’s neck and blood in her thyroid gland, indicating that “Mr. Safra restrained her and prevented her escape” while the bathroom filled with smoke from a fire set by another nurse.

Don't try to pretend that the siblings absolve Ted Maher from his responsibility for having set the fire. I'm sure if he had a billion bucks his name would be in the lawsuit as well.
411 posted on 12/04/2002 12:43:05 PM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]


To: drjimmy
I find it quite odd that children of the deceased were not provided information concerning their mother's death....and I find it more than odd that lots of things "convenient" were not allowed to be brought up at trial, i.e., DNA under the fingernails, etc......surely that kind of scientific evidence would be important if you want to know who it was that the person had touched just before death. I mean, it's not like we carry DNA under our fingernails for the past month...people do wash their hands.
412 posted on 12/04/2002 12:47:19 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]

To: drjimmy
There's also other DNA that was not allowed in trial, i.e., the blood stains on the chair....gee, I wonder that might not have become evidence. Oh, I know, people normally have lots of blood on their furniture. /sarcasm
413 posted on 12/04/2002 12:49:30 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]

To: drjimmy
Don't try to pretend that the siblings absolve Ted Maher from his responsibility for having set the fire. I'm sure if he had a billion bucks his name would be in the lawsuit as well.

Oh, yes....the money....let's see, the Safra Will was changed shortly before his death. Let's see, who was the beneficiary? Oh, yes, the "poor widow" Lily, the very same who collected on her previous two husbands' deaths.

But, yes, let's assume the children have a motivation to sue, but Safra's widow had no motivation, whatsoever, to have her husband killed. I mean, the fact that NO INVESTIGATION into HER background must be "prima facie" evidence she's innocent (even though that's not what is done in any country where justice is sought). Gee, wilickers, that's kewl detective work there, by you and the Monaco po-lice.

414 posted on 12/04/2002 1:00:22 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson