To: SamAdams76
You're welcome. Ted Maher has gotten alot of play on Free Republic as a discussion topic, but little hardcore, big-time American media interest. The case is complex, including a coerced confession and many, many other ins and outs that I think many I've noticed who've posted here today on this thread are unfamiliar. I think more of his story came right back to you when you realized which Maher this was. But, truthfully, so many folks don't have any idea. Monegasque courts are unique and do not have high standing, as one poster suggested. There should be a statement by one of Edmund Safra's brothers tonight in which he addresses the suppressed evidence and coverups at trial, engineered by the Monegasque prosecutor and the court itself. Foreign press, including several well known personages in the American media, felt this trial was a farce from beginning to end. Ted's case is clouded by his unwillingness to back off his claim that he started the fire in the wastebasket; he wasn't able to retract the confession by Monegasque law, which states that the accused must stick with their first claim, even if it indicates guilt. Did he actually kill Safra and Torrente, the nurse? No. They were dead, according to the autopsy reports suppressed at trial, before suffering smoke inhalation. Did he start the fire in the wastebasket--he says he did, but that was not what led directly to the deaths. Even Safra's widow, Lily Safra, stood up in court and said she felt that others were responsible. You don't really need conspiracy theories when the facts speak for themselves.
To: Bkauthor
Can you cite to where you are getting any of these "facts" so we can check them for ourselves?
275 posted on
12/02/2002 2:10:00 PM PST by
brownie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson