[winner3000]

I don't think you're disagreeing with me Dog Gone. If the relevant nation is not taking care of the problem, then they are "harboring terrorists". At this point, it's as if they are the ones who attacked. At this point, this means that they are the ones who violated the sovereignty of another country. It becomes a nation on nation problem, just like the way we intend to take care of Saddam (much more fun to say his name backwards!)

In the same vein, Israel should have no moral problem going after Syria and Iran.

[Dog Gone]

I was elaborating on your point, rather than disagreeing with it. ;-)

I'm sure that this statement by the Aussies is going to make some of their neighbors nervous, but it shouldn't. Wiping out organized terrorism is the goal, not the acquisition of real estate belonging to another country.