Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: logan five
My $.02, and it may not sound very compassionate to some, but natural selection will eventually clean up the bug. It may take quite a few generations, but in Africa, there are prostitutes who should have HIV but are free of the virus. As well as this certain groups in Africa are HIV free because of a mutation in receptor that the HIV ligand binds to. I feel VERY bad or the innocents - the children - who get HIV, but that's about it. Anyone else has HIV because they can't keep a dirty needle out of their arms or cannot keep their peckers to themselves.
13 posted on 11/30/2002 6:44:26 PM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: realpatriot71
My first comment is, I haven't seen any published study which shows that this regemin of drugs actually extends the average life expectancy of someone diagnosed with HIV. Admittedly, I have only read the popular press, not being a doctor. The last thing I did read, some years ago, stated that while persons on the drugs stayed "healthy" and active longer, their life-expectancy was not significantly increased.

Secondly, Keeping an infected person alive and superficially healthy longer would seem, logically, to *increase* the spread of the disease, not decrease it. The motive to avoid contact through the vectors which transmit the infection would be diminished, and the amount of time the infected person would have to pass on the virus would be increased.

Thirdly, this particular disease is spread almost exclusively by careless and irresponsible personal behavior. Why then should I consider it to be my responsibility to fund treatment through my taxes?

Finally, the lack of medical facilities in those countries which report high instances of HIV infection also make it impossible that there has actually been wide-spread testing of the population to determine the actual rates of infection. Frankly, the reported rates of infection and death of AIDS in, say Africa, could be true only if every every death recorded or indicated in the census data for those countries were due to HIV. When it comes to AIDS in the Third World, neither Clinton, nor WHO, nor we, know what we are talking about. The facts just aren't there.

VietVet
14 posted on 11/30/2002 7:56:09 PM PST by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson