Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRESIDENT BUSH SURPRISES PRO-LIFE LEADERS BY SELECTING KISSINGER FOR 9-11 POST
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | November 29, 2002 | LifeSiteNews.com

Posted on 11/29/2002 6:39:31 PM PST by Polycarp

PRESIDENT BUSH SURPRISES PRO-LIFE LEADERS BY SELECTING KISSINGER FOR 9-11 POST

Kissinger Strongly Implicated in Population Control and Abortion

WASHINGTON, November 29, 2002 (LifeSiteNews.com) - U.S. President George W. Bush announced Wednesday that he had selected former secretary of state Henry Kissinger as chairman of a new independent commission to investigate the September 11 attacks. Pro-life leaders were surprised by the selection given the President's aversion to coercive abortion and Kissinger's close association with it.

President Bush was praised by the pro-life community internationally for his defunding of the United Nations Population Fund due to their association with the forced abortion and coercive sterilization practices in China. However, Kissinger was intimately associated with coercive population control as he is the author of the now-declassified national security study memorandum calling for population control - coercive if necessary, in the third world.

Gilles Grondin, a veteran United Nations diplomat and past President of Le Mouvement en faveur de la Vie/Campaign Quebec Vie, (the pro-life movement in Quebec), told LifeSite that he was surprised by President Bush's selection of Kissinger. Grondin, who with his vast UN experience has been one of the most successful pro-life lobbyists at the UN, points out that Kissinger's memo NSSM 200 formed the basis of U.S. foreign policy in the area of population.

Grondin explained that the Memorandum suggested that competition from new world powers would rise when developing nations had sufficient populations to utilize their national resources to their full potential. Thus, NSSM 200 was about ensuring U.S. strategic, economic, and military interest, at the expense of developing countries, by proposing population control including by coercive means if mere propaganda could not succeed.

For more on NSSM 200 including the actual document see LifeSite at:

http://www.lifesite.net/waronfamily/nssm200/index.html

See Bush's announcement of his selection of Kissinger: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/11/20021127-1.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; enslavedtoideology; monomania; nuttylitmustest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501 next last
To: Jeff Chandler
We pro-lifers have some very important battles coming up. This appointment is not one of them, and to raise a stink over it on the basis of Dr. K's stand on abortion plays into the hands of the enemy-it makes us look like a bunch of nutballs.

<> Well then, don't appoint him because he is proabortion but give another reason if you are afraid of criticism in the political arena. Prolifers are going to be called nuts - just read this thread. One may as well appoint only prolifers to office and let others reveal their perversity by their name calling. How in the world is it nutballish to act on principle?

There is always some future battle coming up that we must focus on, and, in the meantime we must accept some losses to win the war' or, so we are told. When so-called Christian Presidents appoint men like Kissinger the war is over. It has been lost

Bush made a horrible decision with this apppointment and conservatives have no duty to defend his bad decisions<>

461 posted on 12/02/2002 4:52:27 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: montag813; Polycarp
And the relevance of this is...WHAT? Who gives a crap what his views on infanticide are?

You're kidding, right?

Too bad no one gave a crap about Powell being pro-abortion. Now look what we're stuck with.

For a man to be pro-abortion he must be either:

1) evil
2) criminally ignorant
3) extremely unintelligent
4) any combination of the above.

All of which disqualifies any pro-abortion man from holding any public office, including dog-catcher.

462 posted on 12/02/2002 5:46:52 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

I forgot...

5) A coward.

463 posted on 12/02/2002 5:48:11 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
WELL WELL. WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL YOU MORONS THIS, BUT WE GET FLAMED AND TRASHED. you guys better snap out of it. you are getting real close to growing a monster you WILL NEVER be able to kill. cameras, monitoring, the whole nine yards. INSERT CHIP INTO HAND WITHIN TEN YEARS.

but, we will not close the borders to terrorist infiltrators.

do you recall how evil ALWAYS parades as the good? WAKE UP.
464 posted on 12/02/2002 5:53:12 AM PST by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan; Polycarp; Jeff Chandler; All
http://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/FR91102.HTM

<> This is a link to a long piece having to do with what is at stake here. Polycarp is right<>
465 posted on 12/02/2002 6:39:44 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
This is a link to a long piece having to do with what is at stake here.

From the 1990 address by Peter Kreeft:

"But we do know this: if God spares New York, He will owe an apology to Sodom."

Peter (and Jerry Falwell) was onto something.
466 posted on 12/02/2002 7:28:52 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
" Character doesn't matter."

Moralists let the perfect drive out the good.
467 posted on 12/02/2002 9:42:47 AM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Moralists let the perfect drive out the good.

<> Is that good or bad?<>

468 posted on 12/02/2002 10:00:07 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
To: Tuco-bad

Quit being a retard.

He'd have to stop breathing to accomplish that...

469 posted on 12/02/2002 10:02:07 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: galt-jw
<> So,bringing Otto Reich, John Negroponte. Elliott Abrams, Henry Kissinger, John Poindexter etc back into the powerstructure in Washington isn't a good idea?
470 posted on 12/02/2002 10:04:19 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
If you think Hastert has done a better job as Speaker than Newt, then you probably think it was good.
471 posted on 12/02/2002 10:06:32 AM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
I read the link. The words "overbreadth", "shallow scholarship" and "hysterical" come to mind.
472 posted on 12/02/2002 10:11:32 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
When our party is finally in power, controlling both houses as well as the White House, led by a supposedly pro-life, evangelical Christian President, this kind of crap should not happen.

Dream on, foot-boy.

Its funny - "The Handmaid's Tale" was running on SciFi this morning. I'm utterly positive that yopu and your fellow theocrat wannabes would love that particular vision of America.

Fortunately, that will never happen - because the rest of us see what you really are.

473 posted on 12/02/2002 10:19:57 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
I'm sure you'll be reeducated.

As I always said - social conservatives aren't interested in individuality or freedom, they're only interested in control.

474 posted on 12/02/2002 10:21:19 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
"I'm sure you'll be reeducated."

These nut cases probably have bids in to buy such surplus "camping " supplies from the former USSR.

Funny while they're dismantling them, these nuts would sure like to be setting them up.
475 posted on 12/02/2002 10:29:10 AM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
HK is a Rockefeller Republican. That is not a born again Republican.
476 posted on 12/02/2002 10:31:17 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
The words "overbreadth", "shallow scholarship" and "hysterical" come to mind.

<> That says volumes about your mind. Peter Kreeft is a Prof of Philosophy who has written many books<>

477 posted on 12/02/2002 11:04:20 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
<> Is Hastert perfect?<>
478 posted on 12/02/2002 11:06:02 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
He is nowhere near the leader Newt is. I want a strong House Speaker. But since Newt's private life isn't perfect, we hounded him out of office in favor of a wimp. But the moralists are happy. These are the same folks who are in a snit because Kissinger is heading a 9/11 committee but does not fit their agenda in areas having nothing to do with the job at hand. They are also the folks who were outraged to find some homosexuals are working in the Justice Department, as if a person's sex life has something to do with their suitability for government work, never mind the basic fact that we all have to work for a living.
479 posted on 12/02/2002 5:03:20 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
But since Newt's private life isn't perfect, we hounded him out of office in favor of a wimp.

Check your history, bud -- It was Bob Livingston who was hounded out of succession for Speaker because of his extramarital affair, which Larry Flynt brought to light with the House vote on impeachment looming.

Newt fired himself as Speaker days after the disastrous November 1998 election left the GOP with a sliver-thin majority, almost completely undoing the gains made by Republicans after Newt's popular "Contract With America." He had already been weakened by the 1996 not-quite-censure and $300,000 fine he was assessed for ethics violations.

Rumors of his previous adultery were well-known before his resignation, and while doubtless some knew of his diddling with a staffer, his leaving his wife for her had nothing to do with his demise.

480 posted on 12/02/2002 5:15:18 PM PST by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson