Skip to comments.
Five Cubans Make It To U.S., Boy Left Behind On Boat
TheChamplainChannel.com. ^
| November 26, 2002
Posted on 11/26/2002 3:25:14 PM PST by Willie Green
For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.
Incident May Reignite Controversy Over Immigration Policy
KEY WEST, Fla. -- An incident in the Florida Keys Tuesday afternoon is already reminding some people of the Elian Gonzalez controversy.
The Coast Guard said that five Cuban refugees made it to shore. But a child left behind on the boat the refugees arrived on may become the focus of a new immigration controversy.
According to Coast Guard members, a "good Samaritan" came across a 21-foot boat that had run out of gas just off Key West. Those towing the boat notified the Coast Guard.
A Coast Guard boat met the boat being towed off shore.
While Coast Guard members were helping to tow in the boat, they said that they checked and found that the only two men who they knew were aboard boat had Florida drivers' licenses.
The boat was towed in to Key West, but when it got close to shore, the Coast Guard said that five men came from below deck, and jumped into the water and made it to shore.
A boy was left behind, according to the Coast Guard.
That boy, along with the two other men who were on board, were turned over to the U.S. Border Patrol.
Under current immigration policy, those who made it to shore may be allowed to stay, but typically anyone stopped while still on water will be returned to Cuba. In recent years, the immigration policy has been a source of increasing controversy in South Florida.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: cubanrefugees; homelandsecurity; immigration
To: Willie Green
2
posted on
11/26/2002 3:28:08 PM PST
by
South40
To: Willie Green
Under current immigration policy, those who made it to shore may be allowed to stay, but typically anyone stopped while still on water will be returned to Cuba. When was this "wonderful" policy put into effect? During the Clinton years?
To: South40
Clinton and Reno's idea of hunting down terrorists.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Luis Gonzalez
ping
6
posted on
11/26/2002 5:56:23 PM PST
by
agitator
To: BillinDenver
Nope, Clinton in 1994.
To: the_Watchman
Clinton in 1994.
To: agitator
Thanks.
To: Luis Gonzalez; BillinDenver
One of you says Lyndon Johnson in 1964. The other says the policy came from Bill Clinton in 1994.
Does either of you have documentation?
Are there any other votes out there?? :)
To: South40
I remember when I first saw that picture I thought it was a joke, that it was doctored somehow. When I learned it was for real it made me sick. That picture sums up 8 years of Clinton, Gore, Reno and the gang. Oh yeah, also pictures of Waco burning. I wonder, if Waco had happened during a Bush administration, do you think Amnesty International would have wanted to try him for war crimes against humanity? But since it was during their guy Bill's administration the strategy of killing the children to save them was O.K. Abortion is O.K. with those liberal types too, so maybe killing children isn't that big a deal, either.
11
posted on
11/26/2002 9:14:13 PM PST
by
Contra
To: the_Watchman
Social tension reached a peak on August 5, 1994, when several hundred (by some estimates more than a thousand) people rioted in a seafront Havana district. Videotape footage of the event showed rioters looting shops, battling police, and shouting anti-government slogans. This was the first major civil disturbance to take place in Havana since the consolidation of the regime in the early 1960s. Although the police regained control of the situation in a matter of hours, Cuban officials later admitted that they were badly shaken by the disturbance. Appearing on state-run Cuban television, Fidel Castro declared that Cuba would no longer prevent "illegal" departures from the island. During the next several weeks, tens of thousands of people congregated on the northwestern coast of Cuba seeking opportunities to emigrate from the island by sea. During August and early September, the United States Coast Guard intercepted more than 30,000 people in the Florida Straits attempting to flee Cuba on homemade rafts. A large number of empty rafts were also found at sea, suggesting that several hundred (by some estimates several thousand) people may have drowned while traveling on unseaworthy vessels.Responding to the uncontrolled mass exodus and seeking to curb unsafe departures by raft, on August 19 the Clinton administration announced that Cubans intercepted at sea would no longer be granted automatic political asylum in the United States, but would instead be given safe haven at the United States Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. The flow of refugees continued unabated until September 9, 1994, when the Cuban and United States governments reached a migratory agreement to stem the exodus. In the September 9 agreement, Cuba agreed to use mainly "persuasive" means to prevent unsafe departures in exchange for United States approval of 20,000 visas annually to legal Cuban "migrants" (despite Cuba's commitment to employ nonviolent means to avoid departures, "attempted illegal departure" remains a felony carrying a two- to six-year prison sentence). The United States in turn would adopt a "wet feet vs. dry feet" policy toward Cuban refugees. Hereafter, Cuban refugees who make it to U.S. shores would be released to family and relatives in the United States, whereas those intercepted at sea by the U.S. Coast Guard would be immediately returned to Cuba unless a very strong claim for political asylum could be made.
Source.
To: Luis Gonzalez
Excellect post Luis!
BTW: I live in Phoenix and you are one of my favorite players. :)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson