Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib
This, for instance. I don't know how many times I've been called a socialist by a "libertarian" because I've supported the idea of prosecuting men who have public sex in restrooms and/or public parks.
You need to divest yourself of that fringe as much as we need to jettison Jerry Falwell!

Yes, but when a party's barely making 2% it tends to focus more on its differences with the other parties than on resolving the variations within itself.

The Constitution Party is really the one I'd favor, if they were ever on the ballot here (Illinois). Unfortunately, it's hard to support a party which doesn't really have much presence. Even the Libertarians, though, I tend to favor over the Republicans in that when they push for too much laxity on social issues it drives people to the Republicans; when Republicans, however, get too tyrannical it pushes more people to the Democrats than to the Libertarians.

Although homosexuals almost certainly do not comprise nearly the 10% of the population claimed by Kinsey et al., many if not most voters know at least one person who is, or who they think is, gay. How should these voters react to the knowledge that many Republicans would put their friend/acquaintance in jail if they could? Some probably brush such fears aside, on the basis that the Republicans would never get that much power. But can you really blame someone for believing that the Republicans pose a threat to their friend, given that the Republicans themselves say precisely that?

The way the Republicans play up things like the gay issues, it gives voters the choice between letting people commit all manner of lewdness in the park, or of throwing their friend (who does not commit such lewdness in public) in jail. Given such a choice, many voters are going to opt for the former even though they really don't like the lewdness in the park, just because they don't want their friend thrown in jail. If Republicans would stop providing fodder for Democrat fearmongers, they might actually be able to get enough votes to actually achieve some worthwhile conservative goals. Of course, if pigs had wings they could fly...

143 posted on 11/27/2002 11:05:15 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
How should these voters react to the knowledge that many Republicans would put their friend/acquaintance in jail if they could?

Oh, drop the nonsense. The overwhelming majority of Republicans that I know don't WANT to know about your personal life behind closed doors. Keep it private and they won't come looking.

You need to look at groups such as ACT-UP, which parades perversion in front of Roman Catholic Cathedrals (so much for THEIR tolerance), or GSLEN, which insists on having their deviant agenda taught in our schools and paid for withy OUR tax dollars.

The Gaystapo is the most intolerant group since Hitler's SS!

144 posted on 11/27/2002 11:32:20 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson