Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrustow
You are working from the assumption that it is illegal for police to use deception in an interrogation, when as you know, that is not true.
21 posted on 11/26/2002 12:07:53 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: mrustow
You are working from the assumption that it is illegal for police to use deception in an interrogation, when as you know, that is not true.

It's only legal because of a Supreme Court decision that is, in its own way, just as boneheaded as Roe v. Wade.

If you expect the citizenry to turn square corners in their dealings with the government, then the government must turn square corners in its dealings with its citizenry.

24 posted on 11/26/2002 12:15:29 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
You are working from the assumption that it is illegal for police to use deception in an interrogation, when as you know, that is not true

No, I am working from the fact that its not right, regardless of what some court of men has ruled.

"Thou shalt not bare false witness" doesn't have exceptions for interrogations.

27 posted on 11/26/2002 12:21:55 PM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson