Posted on 11/26/2002 11:43:30 AM PST by mrustow
Yeah? so what?
Lot's of people die every day. Many in the course of performing their jobs.
Cops are NOT special and it's time they let go of the prima donna attitudes about it.
Pity that Al Qaeda can do that and we cant.
Forgive me but my memory has totally failed me in recalling this guy's name; BUT, there was once a meek, mild mannered Electrical Engineer who lived in NYCity & regularly used the public xportation system to get hither & fro'.
Anyway, he'd been harrased, beaten, mugged -- & on a number of occasions, mind you -- & naturally, the cops couldn't, wouldn't and/or didn't do a damned thing for this guy.
Well, *one* day he'd decided he'd had enough.
He decided he wasn't going to live his life in abject fear of the societal animals & misfits who're really out there running amok on the loose, anymore.
So?
In SPITE of NY's strict anti-gun laws, he bought himself a weapon & began to carry it everywhere to protect himself.
Well sure enough, one night on the way home from his job on the subway?
A pack of 4, maybe 5 animals decided he *looked* like an, "easy mark" and proceeded to ask this man for his wallet.
Now here's where it gets really fuzzy because as the facts go he either refuses them, or, voluntarily gives his wallet to one of these thugs.
Then he nonchalantly pulls out his weapon & wastes 'em right there & then.
I recall this man had been driven to such an extreme breaking point of pent-up anger & frustration he was probably at that moment quite insane becuase he even asked one of the -- now hemmoraging thugs laying these gasping -- "You want another one, good! Here." & >kapow!<
He drilled the asshole, again.
By now people around watching this going down have fled; and, so he's alone [then], right?
He casually puts his weapon back in his jacket & walks right out the door & on home to eat his dinner.
There was a hue & cry unlike anything heard in a long time in the Big Apple, about this.
Naturally, the Lamestream quisling mediots tried ever-so-hard to make this mild -- almost pathetic -- little man (the LEA's had a "manhunt" out for) to be some kind of another,"Son of Sam" David Burkowitz type out *hunting* poor downtrodden minority males.
Had it not been for this man's conscious compelling him to turn himself in?
They'd still be looking for this guy.
I don't think he was convicted of anything much more serious than being in possession of a weapon within NYCity limits when all was said & done; &, rightfully so
But I'll tell you this right here & now.
Should this kind of behavior -- by one racial class or any combination thereof -- *suddenly* discover it's "en vogue" for them to go out & terroize another peoples; whereby, said people enmasse become as threatened as this man had?
Look out.
People will quickly *figure* out what needs to be done, alright; &, whether the *authorities* like it, or not.
Those who cannot muster the courage will remain inside their homes, behind their locked doors.
...prisoners of their own fear.
(The Goetz case may have been the turning point, when newspapers started speaking of muggers "requesting" that a victim turn over his money, in order to eliminate the distinction between robbery and beggary.)
You're right, Landru; he should never have turned himself in. He was convicted of illegal possession of a firearm, and may have (I'm not sure) spent a year inside. A few years later, Goetz, already penniless from his ordeal, was sued in civil court by the young man he shot twice and lost, to the tune of, I believe, $2,000,000.
About five years later (ca. 1989), a middle-aged white man being beaten and robbed by a black gang, drew his weapon and killed one robber. For weeks thereafter, the NYPD pleaded with the man to turn himself in, but he fortunately had the good sense to ignore the cops.
How is the refusal by a substantial group to respect the law a "cultural problem"? I know of legal problems and I know of religious problems, but the phrase "cultural problem" is frequently used today by people who want the clout of a religious problem, but who know that they have no religious issue to raise. And of course it has to do with the very real war on cops.
But what the hell am I doing, arguing with someone who hasn't even taken the trouble to read the damned article?
And you're defining "black supremacy" as "conscience"?! I suppose I shouldn't be surprised at that, coming from someone who talks of "cultural problems."
My point by using the term "cultural issue" is that this certainly is NOT a legal issue (unless of course your intent is to end my right to Jury Nullification). It's definitely NOT a religious issue. Black jurors refusing to convict black defendants is primarily a racial issue, but with the added tones created in a welfare society which continually celebrates "victims". That, to me is most definitely a cultural issue.
Repeat once more... Black jurors refusing to convict a black defendant is absolutely NOT a legal issue. Every jury has the legal right to refuse to convict.
If you intend to challenge that right, my intent will forever be to challenge every attempt you make.
This debate is about the police. This debate is NOT about the military.
Unless your goal is to militarize the police.
God help us if we slide any further down that slope.
I am not 100% sure of this, but I heard that when Goetz saw a police sketch of himself in the news paper, it was so accurate, he felt he had no choice but to turn himself in. That's the rumor I heard.
Nov. 19, 2002 - Mourners hold vigil for slain minister
Nov. 20, 2002 - Teen pleads guilty in slaying of neighbor, 72
Nov. 21, 2002 - Woman, 68, shot dead in robbery attempt
Nov. 23, 2002 - Man, 27, killed near 13th St., Capitol Drive
Nov. 24, 2002 - Man, 22, gets life for robbery gone wrong
Nov. 25, 2002 - Boy, 15, must stand trial in brutal killing of Young
Milwaukee's resident race-baiter editorialist would have you believe the blame lies with the performance of the assigned LEO's (or lack thereof), that demanding parental responsibility for the demon spawn is just a "feelgood" notion, and that "Civic Leaders" & "Society" has failed these poor youths.
As the cries for wake-up calls are shouted from the rooftops of the media, the mantra is always sickeningly the same. Not once is the blame affixed to the perps unless some sort of mitigating circumstance is mentioned as a prologue or epilogue.
I ask you; just exactly who requires the wakeup call here?
There's no such thing as "society"; society is just people. And as for relying on "civic leaders," most civic leaders are crooks. Crooks are supposed to keep thugs in line?
A society that relies on "civic leaders" (even the less crooked ones) as a first line of defense, is finished. The first line of defense should be a mother's voice, saying "Don't do that!"; the second line is the back of a father's hand. And when a child knows that Line Two is around, he's much more likely to pay heed to Line One.
The area in question exemplifies what used to be known as the "rotten borough problem."
Yeah? so what?
Lot's of people die every day. Many in the course of performing their jobs.
Cops are NOT special and it's time they let go of the prima donna attitudes about it.
Oh, I get it -- we have to start caring less about cops getting killed. Yeah, that's the ticket -- not!
I am not 100% sure of this, but I heard that when Goetz saw a police sketch of himself in the news paper, it was so accurate, he felt he had no choice but to turn himself in. That's the rumor I heard.
You may be right, Mark, in which case I take back what I said.
I never said "less". I just get sick of all the cheerleaders trying to make me care more. They're the same as the rest of us, no more and no less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.