Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: #3Fan
Maybe the Assyrians were more brutal than the Babylonians.

Brutality was a way of the times. Look at the Roman brutality in the arenas feeding Christians alive to the animals. And Roman historians have the audacity to accuse the Celtic invaders of being "barbarians"? I suspect most of the references calling one nation or another "brutal" is all in the eye of the author.

429 posted on 11/30/2002 3:18:30 PM PST by Mare Tranquilitatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]


To: Mare Tranquilitatus
Brutality was a way of the times. Look at the Roman brutality in the arenas feeding Christians alive to the animals. And Roman historians have the audacity to accuse the Celtic invaders of being "barbarians"? I suspect most of the references calling one nation or another "brutal" is all in the eye of the author.

God told the Judeaens to go into captivity with the Babylonians and they would be OK, he didn't promise the same with the Northern Tribes. I believe there was a difference in the level of brutality.

432 posted on 11/30/2002 3:26:30 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson