Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'REILLY'S INTERVIEW WITH TOM TANCREDO (Transcript)
The Stein Report ^ | nov. 21, 2002 | Fox News Transcript

Posted on 11/24/2002 10:00:53 AM PST by madfly

Personal Story: Interview with Tom Tancredo Bill O'Reilly

11/21/2002

Fox News: The O'Reilly Factor

O'REILLY: Thanks for staying with us. I'm Bill O'Reilly.

In the "Personal Story" Segment tonight, as you may know, Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo has criticized both Republicans and Democrats for doing very little about the chaos on U.S. borders. Now we learn that top Bush adviser Karl Rove told Mr. Tancredo he is unwelcome at the White House.

The congressman joins us now from Denver.

All right. So tell us about this dustup with Rove.

REP. TOM TANCREDO (R), COLORADO: All right. Well, that happened, actually, quite some time ago.

I think it was probably last April when I did a story -- I mean, I did an interview with "The Washington Times," and my comments in that -- in the paper caused Mr. Rove to give me a call the next day. And I was just leaving my house, you know, with my cell phone, took the call. It says, "White House."

I think, "Wow. This is" -- and it's Karl Rove, and he -- he was very upset, of course, and, during the course of the conversation, he said -- well, I -- he said, first of all, that I was being disloyal to say the kind of things I said because I am, of course, concerned about this immigration issue. It's huge. I lay it at the feet of Republicans, Democrats, the Congress, and the administration. He was very mad about that.

I told him, "I am not disloyal to the president. Disagreeing with the president does not mean you're disloyal. I happen to agree with the president 90 percent of the time, probably 99 percent of the time. In this case, we disagree. And the issue is so big that I'm not going to walk away from it because it happens to be the White House that I'm having a fight with. I don't like this. I didn't want to pick the fight, I assure you."

But he then said -- at some point during the conversation, his comment was, "Well, don't ever darken the doorstep of the White House." That was -- that was his direct quote.

O'REILLY: So no Christmas party for you huh?

TANCREDO: Well, that's it. I was wondering what -- my wife was really upset about that. She likes the Christmas party.

O'REILLY: Yes. Was there a specific comment you made to "The Washington Times" that...

TANCREDO: Yes.

O'REILLY: What was that?

TANCREDO: Yes. I said that, if we have another event like 9/11 and if we have not done any more to protect our borders than we have done, "at that time -- and, by the way, still at this time -- "and if this event was perpetrated by someone who has come across those borders illegally or who is here legally but then overstays the visa and all of the rest of that stuff and we don't catch it, then I'm saying that the people who are killed in that attack -- we are -- the blood of those people is really on our hands in the Congress and in the administration because...

O'REILLY: All right. So he didn't like...

TANCREDO: ... frankly, who else are you going to blame?

O'REILLY: ... that because, as you know, Malvo -- subsequently, John Lee Malvo, another INS botch -- and, apparently, by his own admission, he killed 10 Americans and wounded three others. I guess he is the trigger man now for most of these things.

TANCREDO: Yes.

O'REILLY: Not the -- not only the Bush White House -- and, by the way, we called Karl Rove, and he has no comment on you. But he doesn't like you. But he doesn't like me either, I don't think.

TANCREDO: I get that feeling.

O'REILLY: Yes. I mean, you know...

TANCREDO: The president has -- you know, frankly, Bill...

O'REILLY: What are you going to do? You've got to be honest, and, if you believe what you believe -- and I think you're a sincere man -- I mean, it's your duty to speak out, even if they don't like it.

But here's the rub. Most Americans agree with you, Congressman -- and they agree with me -- that the U.S. military should be moved to the borders to stem the flow of illegal immigration, not to shut the borders down but to plug the holes. Now you just got back from the border today, right, or you were there yesterday?

TANCREDO: Last night. Last night.

O'REILLY: What did -- did you see any improvement at all?

TANCREDO: Nothing. Not only that, it is getting worse. The cartels that have been running drugs across that border for years are now running people across the border. They have taken over the illegal immigration part of this thing because it's become very, very lucrative.

They now -- it's only a thousand or $1,500 for a Mexican, but it is $30,000 for a Middle Eastern or an Asian. So they now run the show down there, and, believe me, they have organized it. They -- it is much more dangerous on the border. It is absolute warfare going on down there.

You cannot -- some of the ranchers on that border -- I do not know how they live there. How would you like to have your 13-, 14-year-old son, grandchildren, having -- if they go one mile from their home, from Grandma's house to Mom and Dad's house, they have to be armed. They have -- they cannot go alone. The harassment -- the threat to the land --

It's just amazing what's going on down there. This is a security risk. People are coming across that border who are OTMs -- that's the way they refer to it, Bill -- other than Mexicans. They are Middle Eastern. They are Asian. They are Chinese. They're coming in huge numbers. They...

O'REILLY: And, mostly, you were in Arizona, right? That's where you were...

TANCREDO: Yes, I was right by Douglas. Right by Douglas, Arizona.

O'REILLY: Right. Now the -- look, we believe you because we heard from everybody down there and nobody says it isn't happening. Everybody says it is. Everybody says...

TANCREDO: Yes.

O'REILLY: ... it's a disaster and it continues to get worse, even after 9/11, and we're sitting here going why won't they move the troops to the border? So you're saying now that the drug cartels have taken over the human smuggling because it's so lucrative...

TANCREDO: That's correct.

O'REILLY: ... and, therefore, they're more dangerous because they're more armed. They've bribed everybody they can in Mexico. They've got no problem over there. And they're coming over, and it -- the stakes are even higher. Now when...

TANCREDO: That's because we now have people...

O'REILLY: ... you present this evidence -- when you present the evidence and all the things that you've accumulated, the Border Patrol backs you up, everybody backs you up, and then you say to your Republican peers, "We need to move the troops to the border," you still don't get any support. What do they say to you?

TANCREDO: Well, what they say is, "Tom, that's an action that" -- you know, here's what the exact

I can give you the quote, as a matter of fact, from the head of the Homeland Defense Agency, Mr. Ridge. He said, when we asked him this, "Why will you not put troops on the border? It is our only hope to defend that border, and we can do it with technology and resources," and he said, "Congressman" -- he said, "There are political and culture reasons why we can't do that." Political and cultural reasons.

Now I want -- you know, somebody else is going to have to go and explain to people who are harmed as a result of people coming across this border that there are political and cultural reasons why we can't protect them. I'm not going to do it.

I'm going to do everything I can, no matter how obstreperous I become -- and I know this is going to get ugly. I know this that we may...

O'REILLY: It's already gotten ugly.

(CROSSTALK)

TANCREDO: ... in this.

O'REILLY: It's...

TANCREDO: It's already gotten ugly.

O'REILLY: But at least Ridge is honest.

TANCREDO: The only thing...

O'REILLY: At least Ridge is honest. He's telling you, "We want Hispanic votes."

TANCREDO: Yes. Straight on.

O'REILLY: Right. "We want Hispanic votes in the Republican Party."

TANCREDO: It's political and cultural reasons.

O'REILLY: And, culturally, we don't have a tradition in this country -- although Teddy Roosevelt did move troops to the border. He was the last...

TANCREDO: Sure.

O'REILLY: ... American president -- of course, if you read the Constitution, one of the mandates of the military is to protect and secure the borders of the United States. So there's no problem...

TANCREDO: Isn't that ironic? Isn't that ironic that Mexico uses troops on their border -- all the time on their side of the border?

O'REILLY: Yes. And they're getting paid by the cartel. Their troops. They're getting paid to bring the stuff in here, and we can't...

TANCREDO: On the northern border, yes, you're right.

O'REILLY: All right. Now, look...

TANCREDO: But they -- they will use their troops on the southern border to stop immigration from Guatemala. They will round up...

O'REILLY: Congressman, what I'm going to do is...

TANCREDO: ... Guatemalans.

O'REILLY: What I'm going to do is, on our Web site, billoreilly.com, we're going to have a link to Governor Ridge where people can give their opinion and a link to you. We're going to set that up tomorrow.

TANCREDO: Great.

O'REILLY: And we're going to have Americans who are interested get to give their opinion directly to Governor Ridge and directly to you. So then you can use that in any kind of legislation you may have proposed. And, Congressman, we appreciate it. We think you're right on on this issue, as you know, and we are going to continue on this story.

Thanks very much.

TANCREDO: Thank you.

O'REILLY: And I'm you can't go to the White House Christmas party, but I won't be going either. So maybe I'll come down there...

TANCREDO: Maybe we'll still get invited. Who knows?

O'REILLY: Yes. We'll have our own party.

Upcoming, as THE FACTOR moves along, it's all over. The bachelor has proposed on ABC TV, But some Americans think this is just atrocious. We'll be right back with that opinion in a moment.



TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chaos; karlrove; usbordersecurity; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last
To: Dane
So let me get this straight, you are all of the sudden concerned about eight immigrants getting murdered in Maricopa County Arizona,

"All of a sudden" is something that you once again attribute to me. Most of the people in the world could come to the US and make a better life for themselves. We cant take in the world. The issue is illegal immigration and the problems that come along with it.

So far the press has reported very little about these 8 murders. Do you think they were otherwise honest workers who were murdered for their money? Or could it have been infighting of drug smugglers?

101 posted on 11/24/2002 5:08:30 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Hi AAA, hows things doing in reactionary world?

Thought your little quip and picture of me being a night watchman on a similar thread last night humorous.

Not quite the big leagues of humor, just yet though, but keep on trying, someday you may exit the minors of humor and politics.

Gotta go, have other things to do(like sleep), can't monitor FR 24 hours a day like you do, but like I stated before keep on trucking dude. One never knows what one can accomplish in America with hard work and gumption, even those hated, by your standards, hispanics.

102 posted on 11/24/2002 5:11:59 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Guess you dont want to have to worry about it huh?

: (

103 posted on 11/24/2002 5:17:22 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: PuNcH
Can you do me a favor and tell Dane that I love people of all races (I'm married to someone of another race) who do right by their fellow man?

It's just that have no patience for blockheads, criminals and politicians who selfishly exploit the country I went to war for.

I would tell him myself, but he's one of the few posters I want to physically harm after engaging.

104 posted on 11/24/2002 5:24:43 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I've never been a one issue voter...

Really? Just a one person voter then.

105 posted on 11/24/2002 5:32:01 PM PST by itsahoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Dane dont listen to well.
106 posted on 11/24/2002 5:43:25 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Have you seen my voter records?
107 posted on 11/24/2002 5:44:20 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Enough is ENOUGH
If the federal government is unwilling to fulfill its obligations under section four of article four of the U.S. Constitution

Section 4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

then the People will have to take it into their own hands...take a moment and imagine all that would entail, it could end up involving more than just illegal entry into the United States. I seem to remember the issue leading up to 1776 involved something about taxes. (TIC).

108 posted on 11/24/2002 5:45:26 PM PST by eldoradude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: marajade
"I just don't see there being support for the military on the borders and a change of law in order to do it..."

If the points I brought up in my earlier posts haven't convinced you there is no need to purue it with you any further. By the way, they don't have to change the law, all they have to do is to follow the Constitution.

109 posted on 11/24/2002 5:50:09 PM PST by Enough is ENOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Have you seen my voter records?

Nope, just your writings. Plain enough to me.

110 posted on 11/24/2002 5:51:03 PM PST by itsahoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
You're making some assumptions that may or may not be true...
111 posted on 11/24/2002 5:57:01 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Enough is ENOUGH
Again, how is Bush violating the Constitution?
112 posted on 11/24/2002 5:57:46 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Enough is ENOUGH
When I enlisted in the Marine Corps and was sworn in, I remember the part about upholding and defending the Constitution of the United States, the same as the president is sworn to do. When the Director of Homeland Security says,

"There are political and culture reasons why we can't do that. Political and cultural reasons."

it is pretty clear to me that said constitution is being violated.

113 posted on 11/24/2002 6:12:15 PM PST by eldoradude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Tancredo's the man! He'll stand up to the Bush administration on illegal immigration and H-1Bs.


Tom Tancredo for President!
De-elect that RINO George W. Bush in '04!

114 posted on 11/24/2002 6:57:16 PM PST by JoeMomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
In other words, rushing into this the wrong way will hand the country back to the Dems.

Outstanding points.

Thats why Tancredo is persona non grata, he doesn't care about the political consequences of his raving.

Troops on the border would only reman in place until the White House and Congress fell back in Democrat hands, which would happen shortly after "President Tancredo" put his plan into action.

Then Mr. Indispensable and his supporters will have a real problem.

He is the GOP equivalent of Pelosi, a politician who cares more about his ideology than his party and the good of the nation.

115 posted on 11/24/2002 7:17:04 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I did not specifically say put troops on the border. There is a large bleeding wound and it has to be closed. Do you have a suggestion.
116 posted on 11/24/2002 7:28:51 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
He is the GOP equivalent of Pelosi, a politician who cares more about his ideology than his party and the good of the nation.

Tancredo is in step with the vast majority of people. Most people want to tighten the reigns on illiegal immigration. The only sin Tancredo committed was to oppose Bush's "outreach" program clearly designed to alienate the GOP base.

The American people are with Tancredo's views on illegal immigration. It's Bush and Rove who are out of step. Tancredo stands on principle, Bush/Rove stand on -- well, who knows what they stand on.

I'll take Tancredo any day over Dubya.


117 posted on 11/24/2002 7:32:49 PM PST by JoeMomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
He is the GOP equivalent of Pelosi, a politician who cares more about his ideology than his party and the good of the nation.

By the way ... how can lax border security and rewarding lawbreaking illegal immigrants be for "the good of the nation"?

118 posted on 11/24/2002 7:43:12 PM PST by JoeMomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: JoeMomma
This may come as a shock but the GOP is not in favor of illegal immigration.

W doesn't need a boor like Tancredo telling him what the situation is, he knows exactly what is going on.

Sorry if W hasn't been able to solve the illegal Mexican problem in 22 months.

People who are a tad bit less maniacal than Tancredo realize that it will take time and tact to solve the problem, unless you really really can't stand Mexicans to the extent that you don't care if 95% of the legal hispanics start voting Democratic.

119 posted on 11/24/2002 7:43:16 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: JoeMomma
rewarding lawbreaking illegal immigrants be for "the good of the nation"?

Every day the GOP is in control is good for the nation.

The Democrats certainly won't do anything to solve the problem.

120 posted on 11/24/2002 7:45:41 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson