[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

In Holy Communion, the Holy Spirit infuses the bread and wine, changing them mystically into the Body and Blood of Christ.

Well -- that is an express, declarative statement of Eastern Orthodox belief.

By comparison, here is an express, declarative statement of Celtic Orthodox belief:

"The Sacraments of the Altar are not the real Body and Blood of Christ, but only the commemoration of his Body and Blood." -- Johannis Scotus Erigena

Three Choices. Pick as many you believe are true:

• A.) Erigena's statement is theologically acceptable to Eastern Orthodox.
• B.) Erigena's statement is theologically acceptable to Roman Catholics.
• C.) Erigena's statement is theologically acceptable to Calvinist Presbyterians.

Well? To WHICH group or groups would the above Erigena statement be theologically acceptable?

Hmm?

[Destro]

OP, while an Anglo-Saxon of the period in question for this article would recognize a Latin, Greek and Celtic Rite Christian they would be baffled by your type of Christianity which is a later innovation. Gain legitimacy for your rite in other ways then to attempt to fit your square peg in the round hole of history.

My challenge to you is this: If the faith you now claim is the same faith of the Anglo-Saxon or Celtic church of old then I suggest you lose the modern trappings and innovations of the Presbyterians and return to the source and embrace all that they embraced.

PS: Make a new thread for the pop quiz material.