Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
So far, not one thing you've posted addresses these judges on the issues of abortion on demand. I'm beginning to wonder what you mean when you use the term 'pro-life'. [You do realize, don't you, that there are rare cases in medicine when a physician should have the right to 'choose' termination of a pregnancy? Would such a physician be removed from some 'pro-life' list in your economy? Since I state that there are reasons for not outlawing completely the physician and woman's right to choose termination of a pregnancy -under rare circumstances, but still a choice- would you remove me from some pro-life list and malign me as a pro-choicer, a pro-abortionist, a pro-death RINO? Radicalization of our desire to drastically reduce abortion in our nation doesn't help the realization of such a goal.]
19 posted on 11/22/2002 10:52:02 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Found one thing so far. Bill Martini as a member of the House voted FOR a ban on PBA.
20 posted on 11/22/2002 10:56:21 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
It's not being radical, the facts remain as they are. Ultra left wing Torricelli and communist Corzine approved these judges without any discussion. It was a rubber stamp for abortion. William Martini was a congressman who ran as a Pro-choice candidate and voted for funding abortion agencies overseas. As I stated in other posts, many of NJ pro-life agencies labeled these lawyers as pro-abortion.
40 posted on 11/23/2002 9:35:07 AM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson