Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redlipstick
Thanks for the correction. I was trying to listen carefully, but I couldn't quite get that part.

They DID say that they're going to argue that Westerfield can't be executed, blahblahblah. I thought the reason was this "new evidence" (which is comical when you continue how long and drawn-out the investigation and trial were).

I heard the quote from the judge, that "his hands were tied" if the defense isn't ready.

3 posted on 11/22/2002 9:33:32 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Illbay
The judge was IRKED after being forced to grant a delay. The defense wanted even more time--one of them said they'd be gone the last week of December--but the judge said, in essence, NO WAY. He started to develop this irritated note in his voice when he found out that the defense hadn't filed the proper paperwork and sounded like he wasn't going to put up with anymore defense BS, er, delaying tactics.
4 posted on 11/22/2002 9:44:02 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Illbay
This is great news. Judge Mudd will be twice as angry when sentencing him on Jan 3.
7 posted on 11/22/2002 11:08:35 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson