Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wednesday, 11/20, Market WrapUp (threat of terrorism on oil pipelines)
Financial Sense Online ^ | 11/20/2002 | James J. Puplava

Posted on 11/20/2002 5:32:48 PM PST by rohry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
The Market Scoreboard seems to be a day behind...
1 posted on 11/20/2002 5:32:49 PM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bvw; Tauzero; robnoel; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; Moonman62; ...
Market WrapUp is delivered...
2 posted on 11/20/2002 5:33:55 PM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Numbers look alright, he just left in the wrong date. He seems to do that every now and then.
3 posted on 11/20/2002 5:55:29 PM PST by DarkWaters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
2 Min ES02Z (s&p 12/02 mini's)
Opening Hour...Gap down open..gap break trade...


4 posted on 11/20/2002 5:58:56 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Refineries in Alaska are local. Fairbanks has a small one, Anchorage has a couple a little larger. Prudhoe has a rudimentary refinery. Not serious targets. The pipeline itself could be shut down for a period, but repair is relatively quick. The Valdez terminal could be destroyed and the pipeline would be back in operation eventually, maybe 2 years.

This kind of target for terrorism would be annoying, but not anything so serious as WTC911.

5 posted on 11/20/2002 5:59:22 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
BTTT
6 posted on 11/20/2002 6:16:07 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This kind of target for terrorism would be annoying, but not anything so serious as WTC911

To the tree huggers it would be worse! All that enviromental damage would be a world disaster! /sarcasm ends here

7 posted on 11/20/2002 6:34:15 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rohry
I don't know how this slipped by me today. I thought sure that they would make jobless benefits more or less permanent.

Jobless Program Will Not Be Extended

Maybe they will be hiring all those unemployed HPQ workers for the new Dept. of Homeland Secruity.

Richard W.

8 posted on 11/20/2002 6:35:08 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
Fantastic chart for TA. Best learning I've gotten about the use of Fib lines. Thanks much!
9 posted on 11/20/2002 6:48:17 PM PST by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Although I am not a tree hugger, I do appreciate the glories and wonders of nature. I figure that I'm pretty average in that respect. On the other hand, I am becoming increasingly uneasy with all the war talk and beating the drum on the urgent need to attack Iraq. GW is starting to sound desparate and is already bombing radar sites in Iraq almost daily. Puplave may be right -- how many American lives are we able to gamble away to be able to fill up the gas tanks on our SUV's with cheap oil. What if the whole economic war backfires and oil prices go up?

As leader gathered in the mediaeval city of cathedral spires, Bush used the centerpiece address of his five-day European trip to press them to "take up global responsibilities or choose to live in isolation from the challenges of our time."

While he did not directly accuse Europe's leaders of indifference toward Saddam, Bush's sternly worded appeal for action against terrorists and like-minded regimes was clearly aimed at the likes of Germany, which opposes military action in Iraq, and France, which forced the United States to water down a U.N. resolution to disarm Saddam. . . .The Bush administration has quietly contacted 50 countries, including Canada, Britain and Germany, to solicit contributions of troops and war material in the event Bush decides to use force, a senior administration official said Wednesday.

Complete article here:

Bush: NATO Should Be Firm on Iraq

Richard W.

10 posted on 11/20/2002 7:01:23 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rohry; Wyatt's Torch; arete; meyer; DarkWaters; STONEWALLS; TigerLikesRooster; Ken H; MrNatural; ...
The Fed has alerted us to the problem, but believes the potential for risk is very low. Why, then, are they making so many speeches making reference to it?

I have an opinion, but not enought tinfoil in which to wrap it.

11 posted on 11/20/2002 7:25:56 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
"Although I am not a tree hugger, I do appreciate the glories and wonders of nature. I figure that I'm pretty average in that respect."

Minerals are where the good lord placed them, not where the tree huggers would like you to look for them. Everything that we use requires one form of mineral or another and we had better start mining and drilling for them here instead of being dependant on some third world country that could shut us off in an instant.

Bring heavy industry back to this country without all the enviro regulations, government regulations, and union rules that stiffel production or we are going to wind up being taken over and become slaves in a socialist world.
12 posted on 11/20/2002 7:31:10 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver

Fib Waves


13 posted on 11/20/2002 7:35:34 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arete
I'm wondering if that was part of the PLAN when Bush was elected. "You will have a war within two years" Is that what the big donors told him? lots of money to made during a war, ask all the businessmen who became millionares during Nam. I know three of them who made it to multi during Nam. One in packaging, one in plastics and one in shipping.
14 posted on 11/20/2002 7:43:08 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arete
Unfortunately there will be war in ME, I prefer we chose the time and place.
15 posted on 11/20/2002 7:44:00 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Ummmm....are you suggesting that President Bush had forknowledge of 9/11 and did nothing about it?...it sure seems to me thats what your saying....He may be a power hungry politician, but he would never sacrafice American lives for political gain...he is principled...unlike the previous occupant.....

And he takes the business of protecting this nation damn serious IMHO

16 posted on 11/20/2002 8:12:08 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Bring heavy industry back to this country without all the enviro regulations, government regulations, and union rules that stiffel production or we are going to wind up being taken over and become slaves in a socialist world.

If you had ever seen, or worse lived in places like Gary, IN or Pittsburgh, PA in the 50,s and 60's, you might not be saying that. Only places I know where the air actually had texture and color to it. Anyway, regulations are only part of the manufacturing problem. The other part is cheap labor and we don't have it. Americans are funny that way. They want cheap goods and services that are produced here which is inconsistent with our high standard of living.

Richard W.

17 posted on 11/21/2002 5:26:28 AM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arete
I grew up in Los Angeles in the 40s and i'll gladly go back to the dirty air, which only affected a few people (let them go live somewhere else if they don't like it) for the clean air and excessive government and socialized society of today.

We also had Kaiser Steel, now shut down, which limited visibility but there again, the living standards that were produced far outweighed the small inconvience of dirty air.
18 posted on 11/21/2002 6:22:07 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
Unfortunately there will be war in ME, I prefer we chose the time and place

The ME without war and insability is like a day without sunshine. If it wasn't for their oil, I doubt that we'd care much about them. Iran is one of the bigger sponsors of terrorism but we aren't going after them because Saddam has more oil reserves and much easier to paint and give a face to an "evil doer". This war is a lock. UN inspections are a sham -- a dance for the sheep to believe that Saddam isn't complying. I just wish that they'd say it clear and simple right up front that way I wouldn't be so disappointed in GW's dishonesty.

Richard W.

19 posted on 11/21/2002 6:36:42 AM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
small inconvience of dirty air.

The little inconvience used to literally kill people, shorten life spans and strip the paint right off cars. You want to go back to that?

Richard W.

20 posted on 11/21/2002 6:44:27 AM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson