Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More fuel-efficiency is needed (Why Not Less Imports?)
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 11/16/02 | Editorial

Posted on 11/20/2002 9:38:11 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Americans are getting a confusing message on automobile mileage. "By driving a more fuel-efficient vehicle, a vehicle powered by alternative fuels, or even by driving our current vehicles more efficiently, we can all do our part to reduce our nation's reliance on imported oil and strengthen our energy security," Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham recently announced.

Good advice. But Abraham chose an odd occasion to make his appeal. He and Environmental Protection Agency chief Christie Whitman were announcing the mileage figures for 2003 cars and passenger trucks. The average of 20.8 MPG continued a downward trend on fuel efficiency that has continued for the past decade and a half.

In fact, the percentage of cars getting more than 30 MPG declined in the new model year to only 4 percent of cars, down from 6 percent last year. So it is even more difficult for American drivers to heed Abraham's call to conserve.

If President Bush, who is Abraham's boss, or Congress really wanted to lessen our dependence on foreign oil, they would have embraced tougher mileage requirements. Yet, Vice President Dick Cheney set the tone for the administration by scorning energy conservation. Congress also backed away from more stringent Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, which have been frozen since 1994. Even pro-environment Democrats played along with the makers of gas-guzzling SUVs when the United Auto Workers union opposed improved fuel efficiency, arguing it would cost jobs (and union members).

Improving mileage isn't that difficult. "We could be averaging close to 30 to 40 miles per gallon, and that's with conventional technology: nonhybrids, better engines, better transmission, improved aerodynamics," said David Friedman, a senior analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Instead, our wasteful ways complicate foreign policy in the Middle East, whose oil fuels not only our cars but also repressive regimes and terrorism. Soon enough, American soldiers could be in harm's way in the region. Rather than winking at the decline in fuel efficiency, our leaders should set about reversing the troubling trend.

The president and congressional leaders should require automakers to improve CAFE standards. They also should call on Americans to share the sacrifices that lie ahead. We are likely to respond.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anwr; domesticdrilling
Consider all of the problems associated with imported oil (we import 60%) and ask domestic drilling resolves.
1 posted on 11/20/2002 9:38:11 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
... or more domestic production (ANWR)
2 posted on 11/20/2002 9:40:00 AM PST by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"We could be averaging close to 30 to 40 miles per gallon, and that's with conventional technology: nonhybrids, better engines, better transmission, improved aerodynamics," said David Friedman, a senior analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Sure we could - if the average price of the car doubles too. The breakeven point for the return on that extra cost? Never.

3 posted on 11/20/2002 9:58:58 AM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
We have spent at least 40 yrs talking this subject to death. Do not worry about an energy supply because if all of the oil left today we would see a new form of more energy the next day. How do you get off of this when the elites put their oil men in the White House? Remember the saying, nothing in politics happens by chance
4 posted on 11/20/2002 10:01:57 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why can't folks just review the fuel economy numbers by car / SUV / truck size. A midsize car (3,000 pounds) with a six cylinder engine will get better fuel economy than a big SUV (5,000 pounds) with an eight cylinder engine.
5 posted on 11/20/2002 11:06:11 AM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
That might be so, but my hopped up 345 rwhp-680 ft lbs of torque, 7000 lb DODGE 4x4 TURBO DIESEL, will get better mileage than a 5000 lb gasoline SUV any day of the week. It is also rated to pull 13,600 lbs. It will also spin 35" tires in 3rd gear and pin you in the seat from 40-90 mph.

And to think that my truck is just "mildly tuned" :)

There are some real wackos out there getting 19 miles per gallon with 600+ horsepower and 1100 foot pounds of torque with these trucks......we don't need no stinkin' little Jap SUV's around here!!!!

Gotta love AMERICAN technology :)

Don't take my word for it go here,

For a hoot visit the "competition forum" at
www.turbodieselregister.com
6 posted on 11/20/2002 11:24:59 AM PST by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Digger
We have spent at least 40 yrs talking this subject to death.

You're right. The idea that government can/should dictate what sort of automobiles Americans can buy just so the nation can meet some arbitrary average statistic based on faulty logic and spurious science should have been recognized as the idiotic, unworkable boondoggle it is 40 years ago. Yet some people still believe it...
7 posted on 11/20/2002 11:27:38 AM PST by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson