Skip to comments.
Bush Nominates Democratic to FEC
Aberdeen American News/ AP ^
| 11-19-02
| SHARON THEIMER (AP)
Posted on 11/19/2002 5:46:01 PM PST by jwalburg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., recommended Weintraub for the FEC spot last May. This is a bad sign.
1
posted on
11/19/2002 5:46:01 PM PST
by
jwalburg
To: jwalburg
Bush hates free speech and has appointed a fellow hater to make sure that our voice is squashed in the political process. There is no way in hell I am voting for this idiot again.
2
posted on
11/19/2002 5:56:25 PM PST
by
Satadru
To: Howlin; Miss Marple; PhiKapMom; Wait4Truth
fyi......
3
posted on
11/19/2002 5:58:50 PM PST
by
deport
To: Satadru; deport
Well, hold on a second... I'm not on the Bush bandwagon by any means, but this article fails to mention that Daschle was entitled to this appointment. Even Slick would appoint Lott's FEC picks. The FEC is evenly divided by party and each side gets to make their own picks. Bush's "appointment" was merely ministerial in nature.
4
posted on
11/19/2002 6:02:27 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: Satadru
Oh, get a life, dude! Bush doesn't "hate free speech." He just has this maddening tendency to be generous to his enemies - namely McCain - when he's at the peak of his momentum and popularity and absolutely doesn't have to.
And consider this. Noisemakers like you and me have been faulting his tactical judgment for 2 years now and what have they gotten us? A GOP sweep!
5
posted on
11/19/2002 6:02:27 PM PST
by
winin2000
To: winin2000
OK. There is a procedural point to this that each party gets their own nominees. I see the point. But, what about independents? In any election, anywhere between 5-8% vote a third party. We need at least one person who is independent to be on the FEC.
6
posted on
11/19/2002 6:05:38 PM PST
by
Satadru
To: Satadru
Your remarks are totally irrelevant, since there is absolutely NO truth to them.
7
posted on
11/19/2002 6:06:31 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: ambrose
Ssshhhhhhh... lol. Let them rant awhile.
8
posted on
11/19/2002 6:06:42 PM PST
by
deport
To: ambrose
Ssshhhhhhh... lol. Let them rant awhile.
9
posted on
11/19/2002 6:06:42 PM PST
by
deport
To: winin2000
What a nice remark you just made!
10
posted on
11/19/2002 6:07:21 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: deport
hiccupping along.....
11
posted on
11/19/2002 6:07:31 PM PST
by
deport
To: jwalburg
I just wanted to personally thank President Bush for signing Campaign Finance Reform into being and therefore making the voice of the 4th estate the resounding voice before election times, whilst eroding, if not seriously degrading, our 1st Amendment rights to freedom of speech...< /sarcasm >
To: Howlin
The Commission is made up of six members, who are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Each member serves a six-year term, and two seats are subject to appointment every two years. By law, no more than three Commissioners can be members of the same political party, and at least four votes are required for any official Commission action. This structure was created to encourage nonpartisan decisions. The Chairmanship of the Commission rotates among the members each year, with no member serving as Chairman more than once during his or her term. FEC
13
posted on
11/19/2002 6:13:40 PM PST
by
deport
To: Satadru
In any election, anywhere between 5-8% vote a third party. We need at least one person who is independent to be on the FEC. Well, when you can elect a mongrel independent to the presidency, then he/she/it can appoint somebody to the FEC.
14
posted on
11/19/2002 6:16:09 PM PST
by
sinkspur
To: jwalburg
Since he has to be confirmed by the Senate, maybe they will vote no. As mentioned, this is the guy McCain wanted and threatened Bush with. A no vote would be great.
15
posted on
11/19/2002 6:37:39 PM PST
by
Angel
To: Howlin
The law calls for 2 democrats and 2 Republicans on the commission. One of the Democrats was very DINO and he got to serve as long as Bush did not appoint his replacement. He votes with the Republicans in all the cases. That got some Democrats in trouble and fined.
Bush waited until after the 2002 election to appoint the Democrat that was supposed to judge the 2002 election. His term was supposed to start about a year ago. The democrats have been screaming about this for months. GASP.GASP.
It was just hardball politics. It is trading stock. You won't confirm my judge and I won't appoint your FEC guy. I keep the Dino guy in that votes for me. It is played all the time. Sometimes even within your own party. Senator Proxmier was always holding up Reagan's appointments for ransom.
There is an old saying that one should never watch sausage or laws being made. Sausage is made by cleaning the pig sh*t out of a pig's intestine and filling it with a combination of pork meat and fat. Some say it tastes really good. I will leave it up to others to say why you should not watch laws being made.
To: jwalburg
Some/most of the lawyers on the Bush team during the 2000 general election in Florida were Democrats.
17
posted on
11/19/2002 6:41:47 PM PST
by
Consort
To: jwalburg
So I guess it looks official: "Democratic" has replace "Democrat." The media goes along as if it always were. Slip it in there and don't discuss the real reason the Dems want to change another word, this one being the name of their part (or an adjective describing a member). The real reason of course is that the name "Democrat" has become dirty. So they use "Democratic" now.
18
posted on
11/19/2002 6:44:11 PM PST
by
bluefish
To: sinkspur
Well, when you can elect a mongrel independent to the presidency, then he/she/it can appoint somebody to the FEC. NO the law requires half Republicans and half Democrats. A president may not appoint an independent. This appointment mandated a Democrat. Bush could only appoint a Democrat to this seat.
Independents have to elect a house majority and a senate majority and a president to get it done. This is nation whose laws have been written by the two parties for over 142 years. There is just one thing they agree on. Make it impossible for a third party to succeed.
For those who don't like Democrats or Republicans their is only way to change things. They have to get into one of the two parties and take it over. The third party people are just idiots. It is not just a stacked deck against them, they are dealt zero cards.
The FEC and the committees in the congress that have control of members always have an equal number of democrats and Republicans. When Bonier was going after Newt that house committee had an equal number of Republicans and Democrats even though all other committees had a majority of Republicans.
Third party people are just grossly ignorant of this nation and its laws. If an independent did get to be president the republicans and democrats would both gang up on him. And they can't use a personality like a Perot to make it with out wining the house. But they can't win the senate in one election. It would very likely take 6 years.
The only time a third party could succeed is when both of the major parties are in agreement on very very important issues and majority of Americans disagree with both major parties on those issues. Then and only then could a third party gain control.
The progressive party under LaFolette got some support in the 1920's. But as they started to be a factor, the Democrats under FDR adopted their views and the progressives died.
None of the progressive leadership ever had any clout except V.P. Wallace. FDR dumped him as VP for Truman in 44.
To: Satadru
Bush hates free speech and has appointed a fellow hater to make sure that our voice is squashed in the political process. There is no way in hell I am voting for this idiot again. Get a life. The political parties have to be represented on the FEC equally - by law.
As for idiots, yes, you qualify.
20
posted on
11/19/2002 6:57:27 PM PST
by
jackbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson