[andy_card]

He has placed a historical display regarding the history of law. Period.

That's not at all what Moore's claiming. Besides, were he interested in historical education, why does he so steadfastly refuse to accept any other historical statues? This isn't about history, this is about Judge Moore's religion, and his decision to use his public office as a platform from which to promote it.

[Jael]

Jael:
He has placed a historical display regarding the history of law. Period.

Andy:That's not at all what Moore's claiming.

Jael: He has the freedom to say anything. Remember?

Andy: Besides, were he interested in historical education, why does he so steadfastly refuse to accept any other historical statues?


Jael: This is about the historical foundation of law in the US. That is approiate for a courthouse. Why does he need to put up any other statues? And you are seriously misquoting the events.

Andy:This isn't about history, this is about Judge Moore's religion, and his decision to use his public office as a platform from which to promote it.

Jael: That's your opinion. Either way, a historical display does not establish a religion.

[yendu bwam]

This isn't about history, this is about Judge Moore's religion, and his decision to use his public office as a platform from which to promote it.

But it's up to Alabamans to decide whether they want him to do that or not. Most Alabamans, I suspect, are in favor of what he's doing. Who are you to tell Alabamans what they may or may not do, or what they may or may not allow Judge Moore to do?