[Dave S]

What I find scary about your compromise is that a religious based idea can only be expressed if no one can be exposed to it. If that were to be accepted, then we would soon lose all our religious freedoms

So your idea of religious freedom and your ability to practice your religion means you have to be free to be in my face about it. Sounds similar to what the gay activists believe, they are only free if they can force us to accept their lifestyle.

[Frapster]

Sounds similar to what the gay activists believe, they are only free if they can force us to accept their lifestyle.

Freedom is a noble ideal - just because a segment of society who embraces immorality clamors for their 'right' to be 'free' to flaunt their immorality doesn't make them right. If their practice was even remotely moral your argument might make some sense.

[yendu bwam]

Sounds similar to what the gay activists believe, they are only free if they can force us to accept their lifestyle.

Gay activists (usually the most intolerant and vituperative people in America) have the right to say whatever they want. NOBODY can force you to accept their lifestyle!