Posted on 11/18/2002 1:14:04 PM PST by L.N. Smithee
If the club that runs the Masters can brazenly discriminate against women, that means others can choose not to support Mr. Johnson's golfing fraternity. That includes more enlightened members of the club, CBS Sports, which televises the Masters, and the players, especially Tiger Woods...
[snip]
Tiger Woods, who has won the Masters three times, could simply choose to stay home in April...if Mr. Woods took that view, the club might suddenly find room for a few female members. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, for example, is said to be a very good golfer.
If Justice O'Connor honestly wants to become a member of Augusta, Hootie and the old boys just might capitulate. But I seriously doubt that O'Connor cares to hang around Hootie any more than her colleague Clarence Thomas would, and she probably is perfectly happy to be welcome at the thousands of other country clubs throughout the world that would be delighted to have the first female Supreme Court justice gracing their 19th holes.
The best way to destroy stereotypes is to rise above low expectations. Tiger Woods has done just that. Feminists, by and large, have not. While there is a wealth of women who have excelled in what were once males-only-need-apply professions, feminists will, without a twinge of shame, shriek in favor of women who don't excel, insisting that special standards be set to accelerate workforce "diversity" even if lower standards for all result in potential danger for the general public. Who can forget John Stossel's interview with Gloria Steinem in which Steinem insisted that it's better for affirmative-action female firefighters to drag people from burning buildings than for firemen to carry them out on their shoulders?
I will be very disappointed in Tiger if he caves in to the ever-growing pressure. Tiger has no more responsibility than any other golfer to be the poster child for this issue. Like a lesser Jackie Robinson, he has heretofore let his excellence and class speak louder than shallow activist showboating ever would. Unlike feminists he doesn't need to create a sideshow -- he IS the show.
Just what the hell is so great about today's "social norms"? I swear some of you people simply don't get it.
I don't think so.
If I were to found a private club and decide that it would be men only, or women only, I should have the right to do so.
To the contrary, Hootie is a man's man. We need more like him.
Tiger Woods to NY Times: Don't Play like You're my Master.
Tiger Woods to NY Times: Don't Publish in the Media
(since some cities may be populated by bigots)
Tiger Woods to NY Times: Don't P*** Me Off
Ah, but then the Liberals would screech that it is such popular that it is really a public accomodation, belonging to all of us, and therefore it must be open to all. Unfortunately, their tiny little brains cannot actually summon the IQ points to realize that in many cases, the exclusive nature is what makes it popular. (I'll bet the Citadel's draw is far less than it used to be)
Actually, Augusta should say that it is open to any woman who can qualify... using the same tees, etc... but then the liberals would shriek about the inherent unfairness of demanding that merit be the sole determinant, since women can't compete on an equal footing.
Of course, no woman can qualify on the same terms as the men, just like the NBA. Women therefore started their own league, making it exclusionary to men, and yet nobody raises an eyebrow at the glaring double standard.
Feminists, when they cannot earn placement on equal terms, quickly demand entry upon the inherent unfairness of a double-standard. When they cannot gain unearned entry through the legal system, they create the exact same system that they (falsely) complained existed to their detriment: a system where merit is irrelevent where one's gender is concerned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.