Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Free State Project: A Project for Idaho
Idaho Observer via Sierra Times ^ | 11/16/02 | Hari Heath

Posted on 11/18/2002 7:26:58 AM PST by Jack Black

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 521-522 next last
To: Roscoe; claidheamh mor
To: Roscoe
http://www.cato.org
http://www.reason.org
And people still say libertarians don't have solutions? Morons...
# 92 by claidheamh mor
To: claidheamh mor
Lemme know when they solve something.
# 93 by Roscoe
**********************

Libertarians solved the problem of how to create a government that would operate under a written rule of law, and created a government that interfered as little as possible with the rights of men.

I think that libertarians have proven that their ideas produce results.

161 posted on 11/19/2002 11:19:15 PM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine; wimpycat
To: wimpycat
Of course, Free State Idaho will have law enforcement - in the form of Sheriffs, who are worshipped by these guys.

The Sheriffs will quickly become the Lord High Sheriff, corrupt and absolute in their exercise of power - and will be dislodged only by much blood and mayhem (which is of course the stock in trade of these fanatics).
# 20 by Chancellor Palpatine
**********************

Libertariams worship corrupt law enforcement officers? Libertarians love violence? Sheriffs will become "Lords," and terrorize the State?

You've been watching too much "Robin Hood," Palpatine.

On top of that, you're deliberately lying about what libertarian principles are.

Society cannot operate without laws; that's why our Founders created a nation governed by the rule of law.

162 posted on 11/19/2002 11:29:09 PM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: home educate
So, according to your logic, (since a nation is an extention of a family), I could concievably self-appoint myself as a member of your family and equally participate in its daily affairs? No need to answer my rethorical question. If we follow your logic, the answer must be YES.
# 136 by home educate
**********************

The nation is not an extension of a family, home educate.

Where do you get that idea? Libertarians aren't "new agers." We believe in old fashioned values.

Even though we all may be "children of God," I'll still shoot you if you break into my home.

You DO NOT have the right to move into my house, nor to participate in my life, nor to talk to me if I don't want to be bothered by you.

163 posted on 11/19/2002 11:38:47 PM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad; Poohbah; Roscoe; wimpycat; Kevin Curry; Boot Hill; VaBthang4
To: Poohbah; Roscoe; wimpycat; Kevin Curry; Boot Hill; VaBthang4
"...Imagine how ludicrous it is that grown adults would seriously contemplate moving to some far-away place just for the express purpose of inflicting their cruel toleration upon their neighbors..."
# 139 by Cultural Jihad
**********************

Libertarian principles created this country.

Cultural Jihad, you say that libertarians want to force their cruel intolerance upon their innocent neighbors.

If so, why did libertarians bother with a Constitution? Why recognize the God-given rights of men, and then charge the government to refrain from interfering with those rights? Why create a system of justice where all men are equal under the law?

Libertarian principles are all that protect our rights. Socialist views like the ones you promote would destroy the rule of law.

164 posted on 11/20/2002 12:01:31 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Are you going to join the free state project? I think it is a great idea. Hell you guys could show us dolts how it could be. Go for it, I support the project 100%. I hope the population of the state that is targeted for liberation is enlightened enough to accept it. I am sure they will be happy to see all 20,000 freedom fighters that will lead them to the promise land. Your name fits right in doesn't it?
165 posted on 11/20/2002 12:06:38 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; wimpycat
To: wimpycat
"...These guys do not understand the history of the regions they are thinking of inhabiting. The range wars of the West were the result of rigidly Libertarian laws regarding water allocation (i.e., no law at all)..."
# 134 by Poohbah
**********************

Our libertarian forefathers created a nation based upon the rule of law. I'd say that is strong evidence that your claim of anarchism is wrong.

Society cannot survive without laws to regulate bad behavior.

Any libertarian would tell you that, Poohbah.

We advocate limited government, not no government. There is a difference.

166 posted on 11/20/2002 12:11:07 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
To: exodus
Are you going to join the free state project? I think it is a great idea. Hell you guys could show us dolts how it could be. Go for it, I support the project 100%. I hope the population of the state that is targeted for liberation is enlightened enough to accept it. I am sure they will be happy to see all 20,000 freedom fighters that will lead them to the promise land. Your name fits right in doesn't it?
# 165 by Texasforever
**********************

"Freedom fighters," Texasforever? You're reading more into this than I've seen. Freedom "voters" would be closer to the truth. They don't advocate force, but instead support a lawful assumption of power.

My "name" has nothing to do with my beliefs, Texasforever. In this case, your own name would fit me better. If they move into Texas, I'll be glad to vote with them. I will stay here, however, if they chose to go to a different State.

167 posted on 11/20/2002 12:18:06 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: exodus
If they move into Texas, I'll be glad to vote with them. I will stay here, however, if they chose to go to a different State.

Texas is not on the list. Sorry. Hell you really need to get with this program. It may just work and you can experience the joys of liberation in all its glory. Be a pioneer, join up. Be a big fish in a small pond for once. I want to see libertarianism in its full glory....don't you?

168 posted on 11/20/2002 12:22:46 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Libertarian principles created this country.

Nonsense.

169 posted on 11/20/2002 12:24:53 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Libertarians solved the problem of how to create a government that would operate under a written rule of law

False.

170 posted on 11/20/2002 12:25:24 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I wonder how long it would be before they were starving?
171 posted on 11/20/2002 12:28:21 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Pretty foul post.
172 posted on 11/20/2002 12:29:23 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I wonder how long it would be before they were starving?

With the massive munchies in the first week of liberation I would give them a month before the junk food runs out and then the WOTwinkies will create a new “police state” .

173 posted on 11/20/2002 12:32:56 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Yeah yeah...

Got it.

"Win" [not "also-ran"] a federal election then give me a call.

174 posted on 11/20/2002 12:42:29 AM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: exodus
" Libertarian principles " did NOT " create this country ". As a matter of fact, Libertarians have purloined some of its supposed " principles " and claim that they invented them / that the FFs were Libertarians; all the while, denying factual history.

If you, for one moment, believe that the FFs and those who lived here during the Revolution and immediately afterwards, were NOT intolerant of much and did NOT " want to impose their " cruel " intolerence on others ", then you don't even know the most basic of things about history or about America !

In colonial times and down to only a few decades prior to today, there were laws against pornography, public lewdness, public intoxication, racial inetrmarriage, prostitution, sodomy, oral sex between even married couples, homosexuality, not attending church, gossipping,gambling, abortion, premarital sex, adultry ( which, BTW, is STILL on the books in Washington,D.C. ! ),stores / business being done on Sundays,blacks voting, women voting, and a whole panaply of other " intolerent " things that Libertarians are for.

Libertarians did NOT ( since they only became a subspecies of a fringe political party about 30 years ago ) write the Constitution, frame the BoR, become president, start this nations, nor any of the other wildly delusional things that you have written or think.

Oh and BTW, Jefferson, for all of the " good " that he did, was also pretty bad , re Libertarian positions. He kept slaves, he was a profligate, and had a losuy take on some foreign policy matters. Heck, he did NOT even bother to go to Congress, so that they could " declare war ", before he went after the Barbary pirates. He also almost got us involved in the French Revolution !

175 posted on 11/20/2002 12:44:55 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
"No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved," wrote Samuel Adams in 1775. "On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders."

http://www.ocregister.com/commentary/columns/greenhut/2002/greenhut20020707.shtml
176 posted on 11/20/2002 12:47:13 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Joe Hadenuf
Your right! But there are millions of American's that have "hadenuf" of the current state of affairs and the two party cartel in DC.
To: Joe Hadenuf
Uh, Joe...if there are that many people who've "hadenuf" of the GOP and the Democrats...then how come the GOP or the Democrats are the ones who win the elections?
# 135 by Poohbah
**********************

The major parties win elections because the electorate has swallowed the propaganda that we have a "two-party" system of government.

Because of the belief that we are a two-party nation, and because of the further belief that there's no difference between the two parties, a large segment of our people don't vote at all, under the assumption that their vote doesn't matter. Another large segment votes for the 'lessor of two evils" in the hope that they can at least slow the erosion of our freedom.

Remember the "Contract with America, Poohbah? Those lawmakers were elected because they convinced voters that they wouldn't act like normal Republicans, but instead would restore the nation to conservative values.

The lies worked; people who usually wouldn't bother to vote went to the polls to elect "real" conservatives, and the Republican Party took over both houses of Congress.

Funny, when the voters found out that their new conservative Republicans were no more conservative than the old Republicans, seats were lost in both the House and the Senate.

Right now, citizens have swallowed the "can't win" mythology put upon the libertarian candidates by both major parties, just as voters fell for the lie that Alan Keyes could never win, even though everyone agreed that Keyes was the best fit as the "idea" conservative Republican candidate.

The Republican leadership wanted the liberal Bush as it's candidate, even though that leadership claims to promote "conservative" values.

The conservative base of the Party was betrayed again, just as it was when the Contract with America was abandoned.

177 posted on 11/20/2002 12:48:55 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
In colonial times and down to only a few decades prior to today, there were laws against pornography, public lewdness, public intoxication, racial inetrmarriage, prostitution, sodomy, oral sex between even married couples, homosexuality, not attending church, gossipping,gambling, abortion

Facts! No fair!!!

178 posted on 11/20/2002 12:49:26 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Libertarian principles created this country.
- exodus
To: exodus
Nonsense.
# 169 by Roscoe
**********************

Really?

Then tell me, Roscoe; what principles were followed in the creation of our country?

179 posted on 11/20/2002 12:51:52 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I ALWAYS post facts. That's the problem with so many Libertarians ; they don't know any and often refuse to admit that such things exist. :-)
180 posted on 11/20/2002 12:53:37 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 521-522 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson