Posted on 11/17/2002 10:41:55 AM PST by jody_b
It's often said that people just won't go into politics any more because of the intense media scrutiny one faces for even the smallest indiscretion in one's past. In fact, the media are temperamental beasts; fierce one day, gentle as lambs the next.
Certainly the media showed its soft side last week. As George W. Bush piously observed Veterans Day, media pundits somehow restrained themselves from pointing to the irony that the U.S. Commander-in-Chief, who's sometimes referred to as a "former fighter pilot," has an embarrassing military past. His records show that for months at a time during the Vietnam War, Bush could be classified as, at best, "absent without leave" (AWOL) or, at worst, as an army deserter.
This would be equivalent to the media withholding comment as former U.S. President Bill Clinton publicly espoused the virtues of marital fidelity.
Indeed, one hardly needs to wait for Veterans' Day to note the irony in Bush's military fervour. The man can scarcely contain his enthusiasm for war ? or at least for others going to war. As he inches closer each day to sending tens of thousands of American soldiers into Iraq (to be followed likely by hundreds of Canadian soldiers), any day would be appropriate for the media to satisfy its allegedly insatiable appetite for dirt on the rich and powerful by reporting the president's own military past.
The legwork has already been done by the Boston Globe, which dug up Bush's military records and interviewed his former military commanders.
While the paper published its dramatic findings during the presidential campaign of 2000, the rest of the media all but ignored the story and continue to do so, even as Bush has turned himself into arguably the most hawkish president in U.S. history.
It's not that the media are not hard on military laggards. While there were only 49 media stories about Bush's military past during his presidential campaign, there were a whopping 13,641 media reports on Clinton's Vietnam-era draft dodging during his first presidential race, according to former Clinton aide Paul Begala.
Begala made the observation on a media panel at a labour conference shortly after Bush's election. Other panelists, including journalists from major TV networks and Time magazine, agreed that Bush had had a much gentler ride, but attributed it to the media's alleged exhaustion after all the Clinton-era scandals.
Of course, it's possible Bush was so morally repelled by the U.S. slaughter in Vietnam that he just couldn't bring himself to participate. But probably not. Here's what we know.
Upon graduating from Yale, Bush applied for a position in the Texas National Guard, a coveted spot that required only part-time military duties at home, far from the battlefields of Vietnam. Bush was catapulted to the front of 500 other applicants after a friend of his father, then a wealthy Houston congressman, phoned the Speaker of the Texas House, according to the Boston Globe.
After completing training as a pilot, George W. Bush requested and immediately received a transfer to an Alabama National Guard unit in May, 1972. But Bush never showed up for duty there, according to the Alabama unit's commander and the commander's assistant, who were interviewed by the Boston Globe.
Military records show that Bush's two commanding officers back in Texas reported George W. did not show up for duty there either for a year, and that they believed he had been transferred to Alabama. Meanwhile, when Bush failed to take his required annual medical exam in August, 1972, his pilot status was removed.
It should be noted that reporting for military duty is not something that's optional, particularly during a war. Those caught shirking National Guard duties were usually punished by being drafted into the real army ? the one that landed you in Vietman, where some 350 American soldiers were killed each week. But, despite more than a year absent from duty, nothing happened to the well-connected George W. Bush.
Favouritism is a sore point among those who actually went to war, including U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell. As Powell wrote in his autobiography: "I am angry that so many of the sons of the powerful and well-placed ... managed to wangle slots in Reserve and National Guard units ... Of the many tragedies of Vietnam, this raw class discrimination strikes me as the most damaging to the ideal that all Americans are created equal ..."
You've got to marvel at Powell's anger management skills.
Actually, the Dims never proved the charge to begin with. The most they have is that someone doesn't specifically remember Bush 30 years ago.
That's it.
But the real issue now is LIBERAL PANIC and INANE RANTING.
Now that the Dims are out of power and humiliated the attacks by liberal shills in the media will increase. Of course, the only people who take this story seriously are the DU/Fartcop crowd.
Ultimately, this idiot story will end up backfiring on the Dims as every other one has, but given that the dims have no issues, all they have left is rumor and innuendo.
They were both doing their time with the Intelligence Community: Getting their tickets punched for much higher level government service.
The stories of Clinton's recruitment by CIA biggie Cord Meyer are readily available at Orlingrabbe.com. That's the real reason he was able to avoid uniformed military service.
But the curious gap in George W. Bush's guard service, mainly in 1971, coincides with a period when, according to the NYT, he was working his first real job out of Yale, for one Robert Gow. Gow is a very curious character whose resume fits well with that of a spook. He hired Dubya, according to the Times, to scout out horticultural sites in Guatemala and Central America. Hmmmmmm. Interesting work.
My guess he was seconded to the CIA or some other intelligence arm of the government. He was doing his time, but not exactly in uniform.
Think about it: His father had been long involved in CIA activites and would eventually become CIA director. Spookery runs in families, and the politico-intelligence elite make sure to bring along their progeny. Merely flying an obsolete jet in a non-combat homeland role during wartime is not the stuff legends are made of. As Machievelli pointed out, there is no more valued or important warriors than a spy. But it's not something you can exactly brag about.
Saving this thread for future references, especially since it's past my bedtime here in the East.
foreverfree
Please keep in mind that Eisenhower never heard a shot fired in anger in his entire career."
Back up that statement, loser. Show me just one official US Government document that says it is so.
Of course, idiot, you have no documentable proof outside of your rabid hatred for your baseless allegations. Go find someone who gives a damn about your personal problem with the President. I certainly don't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.