Replies

... What are you mentally deficient? And if I post from the Koran where Allah directs his followers to kill the unbelievers to show the nature of the enemy does that mean I endorse the friggin Koran? How else can I show the nature of the enemy? ...
Posting from the Koran to make your case would have perfectly legitimate. But you didn't do that. And you miss the distinction, and it is a critical distinction. The article you posted bases its claims about the so-called relationships among the groups that you want to say are related on grounds of Nazi-Zionist collaboration, on grounds of concentration camps ravaged by disease instead of Zyklon B and gas ovens, on the notion that the Nazis were simply the good-hearted, mis-guided dupes of Himmler, on the notion that RACE is the determining factor in world history. For you to buy into the one notion, you have to buy into the other.

If you deny the authors grounds, you deny the author's claims, in which case you deny your own claims, so why bother posting the article? Find other, more factual grounds to make your claim, or simply admit that it was your intention to post white-power-identity propaganda on FR in the guise of an anti-Muslim rant.

Before you say stupid things you ought to check out Destro's posting history. This is how you know what someone is up to. You obviously failed to do this before going into kamikazi mode. At this point I don't care about your self-justifications. You are dead wrong about him.

GOOD-BYE!

I do not buy the author's premise. It only shows that he and others like him do accept that view as fact. Is not the Koran the ravings of a Gnostic influences lone nut? That you can think otherwise is your problem.

The Protocols of Zion was a forgery cooked up by the Czar's secret police to defame Jews. It failed to be accepted in Russia but gained acceptance in post WW1 Germany/Austria. Kaiser Billy himself paid for its publication and via the Nazis it has spread to the Arabs.

"or simply admit that it was your intention to post white-power-identity propaganda on FR in the guise of an anti-Muslim rant"

I think possibly you're being just a bit too defensive on this point.

This statement looks to me like a case of projecting.