Physicists Puzzle Over Unexpected Findings In "Little" Big Bang

Science Daily | University of Rochester ^ | 11/13/2002

[sourcery]

FYI

[I'm ALL Right!]

Okay, fine....someone is going to post this, so I'll be the first. The thing missing in their experiment... YES! It was the HAND OF GOD.

[griffin]

Cool....BTTT

[griffin]

Does God exist?

[I'm ALL Right!]

Nice bait...

[farmfriend]

If you have a ping list, please add me.

[farmfriend]

ping

[Free the USA]

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list

[MHGinTN]

Actually, the variance from expectations could be an indication that the temporal constants aren't really constant, but the recording of the events are staticized, so to speak ... an image of the event is a 'flat temporal' picture (as in the universe could be flat temporally, but it isn't).

[griffin]

"Nice bait..."

Too obvious, 'eh! :))

[I'm ALL Right!]

Actually, the variance from expectations could be an indication that the temporal constants aren't really constant, but the recording of the events are staticized, so to speak ... an image of the event is a 'flat temporal' picture (as in the universe could be flat temporally, but it isn't).

Yeah, that was my second thought...haha

[griffin]

The only "flat temporal picture" I ever see is one that forms if I take too long to drink my Summit. :(

This is very interesting although I don't understand it. I guess it is times like these when you get to figure out what you've been missing all along, apply it to other past testing and experiments, and find out what you didn't know a few years ago.....and develop more questions than you had before. Big find.

[hove]

"Does God exist?

By asking the question, you have just answered your question.

[griffin]

I just hope we don't sell THIS to the Chinese too.

[griffin]

"By asking the question, you have just answered your question."

Really? You mean He doesn't exist, or I haven't noticed Him before?

[MHGinTN]

Hey, I'm only guessin'. I'll get back up on the porch when the big dogs weigh in.

[sourcery]

If you have a ping list, please add me.

Done.

[griffin]

"Actually, the variance from expectations could be an indication that the temporal constants aren't really constant, but the recording of the events are staticized, so to speak ... an image of the event is a 'flat temporal' picture (as in the universe could be flat temporally, but it isn't)."

Kinda like the Uncertainty Principle?

[MHGinTN]

Not really, I mean Heisenberg's uncertainty was a spatial/temporal flux explanation, where I'm guessing that time has variable expressions which phyisics has yet to include in theories ... past, present, future are expressions of a dimension that is woven with dimension space to manifest continuums and energy exists in certain continuums that define the characteristics of that energy, ex.: linear/present is the continuum responsible for light.

At the original bang of the universe, space could have expressed first as a linear expression, then a planar expression then a volumetric expression, and time could have expressed via three variable expressions also. Uh, I just glanced around ... it's time for me to get back up on the porch.