Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: <1/1,000,000th%
It's all over both sides of the evidence. If it works, it's re-used. If it's different, it's because the designer knows something we don't know.

Well, I hardly think evolutionary theory is the model of consistency we should all aspire to.

In the engineering side of my company, we can re-use design components where appropriate and that is certainly most efficient where it is applicable. There are other situations where we have to start nearly from scratch, because the solution demands a different design from the ones that we already have stored in our AutoCAD templates file.

It's design to fit the specified operating parameters. We do it all the time.

66 posted on 11/14/2002 7:43:21 AM PST by CalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: CalConservative
It's design to fit the specified operating parameters. We do it all the time.

At random, with no rhyme or reason. Just as predicted by ID.

69 posted on 11/14/2002 8:16:44 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson