Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Please see posted source url for rest of story.
1 posted on 11/12/2002 2:16:54 PM PST by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ladysusan
There might not be a medical reason that a woman cannot have a baby after 50, but I think there are sanity issues she might want to consider.

2 posted on 11/12/2002 2:19:34 PM PST by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladysusan
Why? I had my fourth child at 26 and am happy that I'm here for my 9 grandchildren, although I'm too stiff to crawl around on the floor with them. Can you imagine if I had to raise them?

I worry about my daughters who didn't start their families until 35 and 38. Will they be there for their children's graduations and weddings? There are no guarantees in life.

7 posted on 11/12/2002 3:50:02 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladysusan
I have never understood why people turn into instant condemnatory busybodies when it comes to what others decide in the child-rearing department. Live and let live.
11 posted on 11/12/2002 6:49:38 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladysusan
A baby in their 50's.....???? Yeah, right.........I became a Grandmother when I was 42, and would spend several hours at a time with my Grandson when he was 18 months to 4 years of age........THAT experience convinced me NO WOMAN past the age of 45 should have babies. And, I'm a woman in really good condition.(Of course, there are those with their Nannies, but hey, they aren't raising babies, just having pets.)
12 posted on 11/12/2002 6:55:09 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson