>>Fed is a market follower not a market leader<<
I didn't know this until I read one of his previous columns. The Fed actually "reacts" to the interest rates and doesn't actually set them.
As far as tax cuts, IMHO, the reason the Reagan revolution didn't also eliminate Democrats from the face of the earth is that the spending wasn't checked - eventually leading to tax increases. Now that we have the Republican trifecta, let's go for it.
1 posted on
11/11/2002 2:47:11 AM PST by
The Raven
To: The Raven
Laffer is a really important person in the history of modern supply-side economics, and he makes some good points in the article, but he also says some things that makes me think he was drunk when wrote it. For instance, the Fed does much more than jawbone the fed funds rate.
You bring up the point that the Fed is a market follower. Well, that's true in the best of cases. For the past seven years or so, Greenspan has ignored the market completely.
2 posted on
11/11/2002 3:18:41 AM PST by
Moonman62
To: The Raven
We've Cut Rates, Now Let's Cut Taxes To make it obvious to everyone that neither of these will have any positive effect so people will finally start listening to the Austrians?
3 posted on
11/11/2002 6:48:19 AM PST by
Deuce
To: The Raven
Remove the double taxation of dividends bump
7 posted on
11/11/2002 9:33:26 AM PST by
CPT Clay
To: The Raven
Partial privatization BUMP!!!!
8 posted on
11/11/2002 9:43:34 AM PST by
CPT Clay
To: The Raven
Bump
To: The Raven
...the president, with his new-found majority in Congress, could succeed in major tort reform... The regulatory and litigation burdens on the economy are immense -- in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually, at least. Remove these, and watch us fly.
20 posted on
11/12/2002 6:45:18 AM PST by
Phaedrus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson