khangaskhan, truly believed that the reason Liberals don't debate is that bringing conservatives to their glowing state of enlightenment would be like trying to bring a chimp to the understanding of higher math.
And here in lies the fallacy and the lie of Liberal/Socialism, and their phoney compassion. As history records democracy and socialism fails, and it fails repeatedly and always ends with the death rattle of a civilization or nation. But like the old joke about a man who keeps hitting himself on the head with a hammer and tells his Doctor, "Doc it hurts when I do this", and the Doctor advises, "Well, stop doing that", the Liberal insists that, given one more chance, this time the end result will be different. Liberals believe, despite all evidence to the contrary, that socialism won't fail because all that it lacked to succeed in the past was the personal input of their socialist illuminaries.
If socialism's madness were not so destructive one could laugh at the incredible egos of those afflicted with the mental incapacity. But like a man who impulsively decides to go into the sheep ranching business and, against the advice of his far more experienced peers, decides to put his pet domesticated wolf in charge of guarding his flock. Things appear to go well at first as long as he keeps the wolf well fed.
And that is what socialism is, a wolf with an ever increasing appetite that can never be satisfied who begins to consume those he was mandated to care for.
It doesn't matter to socialism that the rich create jobs, Daddy Warbucks kids want to go into business for themselves and everyone benefits, or Daddy Warbucks will invest in start up companies or the stock market and everyone benefits. No socialism says that the very fact that Daddy Warbucks is ambitious, smart, and successful makes him evil, and calls on those in whom they have developed a taste for self pity and resentment to make the moral distinction that he is an evil man who has robbed them and is selfishly hording for himself what could be put to better and more noble use by them. So they rob him, punish him, regulate his abilities, and no one cared because there is no sympathy for the rich.
But the wolf, with an ever increasing appetite, begins to lower the bar on the definition of rich to include the tips of the divorced waitress at the diner with two kids. Socialism decides that the 80 year old woman who is delinquent .02 cents on her property taxes would better serve the whole to have her property confiscated and put to better use, while she herself would benefit by surrendering her independence and allow herself to be cared for by an underfunded nursing home provided to her via the theft of resources being doled out by socialism. Should she resist she is selfishly hording from socialism what it needs to cover an ever widening and thining pool of resources that is spreading over every nation as it begins not to be able to impact the very needs it was intended to cure.
Socialism is neither compassionate nor workable and this is why khangaskhan was banned. The powers that be know this already and can't have someone around who is begining to question their tactics or logic.