[VadeRetro]

Dembski is so unfamiliar with science that he doesn't realize that all claims and arguments are connected via a historical timeline and a progressive accumulation of evidence.

ID is the daydream that if you can point out an anomaly somewhere, a house of cards comes tumbling down and suddenly all ideas are equally valid. The way is then clear to bring back something falsified by a million "anomalies" in the last 150 years.

[Condorman]

ID is the daydream that if you can point out an anomaly somewhere, a house of cards comes tumbling down and suddenly all ideas are equally valid.

In such an environment, it is difficult to offer valid criticism of the theory of evolution. Anit-evolutionists immediately seize upon such criticism as reason enough to scrap the whole shebang, and the defenders of evolution, conditioned by such tactics, often reflexively dismiss such criticism as more of the same.