I mean if someone did find one ‘human' skull 3 billion years old, what would you say?
Look, I’ve always seen ID as a ‘theory of everything’ more than a ‘theory for biology’
Pssst… Let me let you in on a little secret… ID is not stealth Creationism, but the Information Theory is stealth ID.
Don’t tell anyone though, OK…
I’ve given away the whole conspiracy…
Disregard the last post please!
C'mon! You can think of a falsification.
I mean if someone did find one ‘human' skull 3 billion years old, what would you say?
I knew you could!
To answer your question, it depends. Just for one thing, it depends on whether or not it turns up in Paluxy River, TX and is found by Carl Baugh.
In Darwin's day, the picture presented by the fossil record, the geologic column, and the then-known extant species had just crystalized enough for he and Wallace to see what is going on. 150 years later, it's getting unlikely--a little late in the game--for the trends in the evidence becoming apparent then to reverse. But an apparent 3-billion year old skull would demonstrate that something we think we know is wrong.
Pssst… Let me let you in on a little secret… ID is not stealth Creationism ...
Is it supposed to be science? There's never in history been a science with less intellectual content.