Totally false, I have never said that.
I have however said that you, Junior, are an atheist and are falsely portraying yourself as a Catholic. I have much evidence for this - from your own mouth. You reject both that God created life and that God created man and instead insist on a materialistic explanation for both. You further join with atheist evolutionists in attacking religion. Your words are almost indistinguishable from those of the atheists in your group and have never heard you distance yourself from the atheist statements of the atheists in your group. In addition, when I legitimately try to question you on your assertion that you are still a Catholic, you refuse to answer and instead send in your gang to attack me for daring to question you on what you have given as evidence on these threads.
If you are still really a Catholic, you will discuss the above unCatholic behavior and explain how a Catholic can indulge in such behavior. If you do not, then I am completely justified in not considering you to be a Catholic or any sort of Christian as you claim to be.
You have absolutely no idea of what you speak, but then again your every post bears this out. I believe God created life in such a way as to be indistinguishable from natural processes -- after all, God set the universe up in the beginning, didn't He? Why would he need to step in a tweak His creation afterward? Would that not indicate God was not perfect and capable of getting it right the first time? No. God makes Himself known to let us know He's still there and what He expects of us -- not to add or delete from His creation. The Bible specifically makes this point. God didn't zap new species into existence after the Flood, did He? No, He made sure that extant species survived. Even if the Flood story is an allegory (and I believe it is) it shows God's modus operandi when it comes to life on this planet: He works with what is already there.
Your virulent tunnel vision is bordering on a psychosis.