Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
That's not much more than the very criticisms we lay on ID ("there's no positive evidence for ID"),

There is positive evidence for ID - the impossibility of life arising from inert matter is one recognixed by scientists, the extremely well designed universe is also another evidence recognized by science, Behe's claim of the irreducible complexity of the bacterial flagellum is also strong evidence for ID and it has not been refuted.

except that he spins them as opportunities for further research instead of criticisms of the theory.

What Dembski shows is that ID can be the basis of research. Whether people do the research or not is irrelevant as to whether the theory itself is correct. Anyways, the research is taking place regardless of what it is called because life is indeed intelligently designed and the findings of real scientists doing medical, biological and other research are showing the complexities of life. These ever deepening complexities show the interconnections of all functions of an organism, interconnections which cannot be altered either arbitrarily or randomly.

482 posted on 11/10/2002 7:34:08 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
Matter isn't that inert ;)
487 posted on 11/10/2002 8:01:22 AM PST by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson