[CalConservative]

You are wrong. Go back to about post 90. You posted the list in response to a request for mainstream scientists with impeccable credentials who support ID.

I guess I might consider it a bit presumptious on your part to tell me I was wrong in explaining my own thought process, but you apparently know what I'm thinking better than I do.

Please read the statement preceeding the list. If there was some intent to deceive, it seems unlikely I would have posted that statement with the list is there. It seems pretty clear to me what it was saying, but perhaps I need some verification from you to make sure I'm actually thinking what I am thinking.

[Condorman]

You posted the list in response to a request for mainstream scientists with impeccable credentials who support ID.

It seems pretty clear to me what it was saying, but perhaps I need some verification from you to make sure I'm actually thinking what I am thinking.

It was pretty clear to everyone, really, but maybe you just need a refresher course in basic reading comprehension. We'll take it step-by-step, and I'll type slow so you can keep up.

I know a number of scientists who are ID proponents and their scientific credentials are impeccable, as is their work.
4 posted on 11/07/2002 10:27 PM EST by CalConservative

Names?
92 posted on 11/08/2002 10:18 AM EST by Right Wing Professor

Here's a start, but you already know that, right? [List, blah, etc, snip]
100 posted on 11/08/2002 10:51 AM EST by CalConservative

Now do me a favor: the next time you need to be spoon-fed, knock on someone else's door.