[Leto]

I thought Pasco was involved with Schlundler as well, that campaign seemed to have the same problems as Forrester's campaign.

If I am wrong my apologies, but both times we have had very poorly run general election campaign's that both has candidates try to run as liberials. With the same disasterous results ( I give Schlundler more of a break here due to the GOP active campaign to destroy him and deliver us to McGreevy).

Why did it take Forrester so long to get on ads against the Louse and why were his ads so soft? The ones run by the RNSCC committee were much better.

[Coleus]

Why did it take Forrester so long to get on ads against the Louse and why were his ads so soft? The ones run by the RNSCC committee were much better.>>>>

He had bad advice, Tom Kean and Senator Joe Kyrillos. You had a liberal running against a liberal, the more liberal, Lautenberg, won. It's happend for 20 yrs. in NJ.

And as Bob Grant said, Forrester was a gentleman.
He just didn't fight hard. He never called the Louse a left-wing liberal and on all the Lauses commercials, they called Forrester right wing, extemist,etc.

Let's face it, from the links I posted and saw on the FR, the pro lifers, pro gun, pro private SS accounts, won. The liberals lost, Forrester and Schundler should have hired Rick Shaftan, a conservative, to be their consultant. They refused.