Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PaulNYC; tsomer; Mixer; MattinNJ; OceanKing; TomT in NJ; firebrand; KeyWest; par4; barkeep; ...
Those US Senate Candidates who WON were pro life, pro-gun and pro-private Social Security Accounts and pro (multi) tax cuts. GOP can't lose on privatization GOP can't lose on privatization

November 11, 2002

BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

Rep. Tom Davis deserves plaudits as the superb congressional campaign chairman who led Republicans to midterm gains, but he might ponder one serious mistake. Davis advised candidates to avoid Social Security. In fact, Republicans who ignored him prospered last Tuesday.

Victories by candidates who vigorously endorsed individual private retirement accounts shattered a tenet of American political folklore: Social Security is the third rail for Republicans; touch it, and you will die. This year, almost all brave enough to touch it survived. Some who did not were losers, raising suspicion that they should have taken the risk.

The issue did not herd panicky Social Security recipients into the Democratic pen. A Public Opinion Strategies study shows a 12-percentage point Republican advantage among senior citizens Tuesday. But will a Republican White House inclined toward caution about radical domestic proposals truly embrace the issue? Conservative activists attending a closed-door meeting Wednesday morning were stunned to hear Bush policy aide Barry Jackson spend 15 minutes extolling Social Security reform, and this is not a White House whose staffers free-lance.

The third rail's failure to work did not result from lack of Democratic trying. Cookie-cutter campaigns were waged coast-to-coast, accusing Republicans of threatening elders with reckless schemes. Nobody was more aggressive than Jack Conway, a telegenic young hope of Kentucky Democrats seeking to unseat three-term Republican Rep. Anne Northup in Louisville's traditionally Democratic 3rd District (carried comfortably by Al Gore against George W. Bush). Northup was made a prime Democratic target nationally.

At one senior citizens rally, Conway displayed a chart showing slumping stock prices and asked: ''Would you like your privatized Social Security investment account to look this?'' Northup did not take Tom Davis' advice and retreat, while Conway betrayed the inexperience of a 33-year-old by admitting the alternative to private accounts. ''We're going to have to look at the retirement age,'' Conway said. ''We're going to have to look at benefit levels.'' He later took those options off the table, but it was too late.

Rep. Pat Toomey, a leader in pressing for private accounts, increased his victory margin in his Democratic-leaning Pennsylvania district. Representatives Clay Shaw of Florida and Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, who in 2000 narrowly won districts containing lots of pensioners, each reached 60 percent Tuesday after campaigning for private accounts. That was the position of 40-year-old corporate CEO Chris Chocola, who upset a seasoned Democratic campaigner attacking him on Social Security, former Rep. Jill Long Thompson, in traditionally Democratic South Bend, Ind. Another reformer, John Kline, defeated Democratic Rep. Bill Luther on his third try in Minnesota.

Bush's private investment plan was backed by winners of key races that recaptured the Senate for Republicans: Lindsey Graham in South Carolina; Norm Coleman in Minnesota; Saxby Chambliss in Georgia; John E. Sununu in New Hampshire, and, especially, Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina. Erskine Bowles, Bill Clinton's White House chief of staff, hammered Dole on Social Security. She responded by exhibiting a blank piece of paper labeled: ''Bowles Social Security Plan.'' The only losing Republican reformist was Sen. Tim Hutchinson in Arkansas, and he suffered from family values rather than retirement issues.

Not all Republicans were steadfast. Jim Talent backed away in Missouri and barely won his Senate seat. South Dakota's Republican candidates in close races--Gov. Bill Janklow for the House and Rep. John Thune for the Senate--retreated. Janklow won handily while Thune lost narrowly. Ten-term Rep. George Gekas of Pennsylvania came out against private accounts and was the only Republican loser in the four Republican vs. Democrat pairings of two incumbents caused by redistricting.

The object lesson came in New Jersey, where neophyte Republican Senate candidate Doug Forrester was pounded for wanting to ''privatize'' Social Security. He responded by pledging never to touch the system, and then lost badly to old-fashioned liberal Frank Lautenberg.

House Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt and his House campaign chairman, Rep. Nita Lowey, had publicly declared the 2002 election a ''referendum on Social Security.'' The verdict was delivered Wednesday by the moderate Democratic Leadership Council, which pointed out the futility of ''attacking Republicans on Social Security'' as a ''silver bullet'' and losing four straight elections.

NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE-PAC

For Immediate Release November 11, 2002
Contact: Marie Tasy, Director of Public & Legislative Affairs

(732) 846-2000
WAKE-UP CALL FOR NJ GOP: TIME FOR A CHANGE

NJ GOP bucks national trend: Pro-abortion U. S. Senate candidate Doug Forrester loses by 10 points while NJ voters overwhelmingly elect 5 out of 6 Republican Pro-Life Congressional Representatives

Once again, the NJ GOP is out of step with the rest of the nation. While many states picked up Republican U.S. Senate seats and gubernatorial victories, NJ's Republican Party once again failed to ride a national GOP wave to victory when former Democratic U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg soundly defeated NJ’s Republican U. S. Senate candidate Doug Forrester.

“How many more elections are NJ Republican leaders willing to lose with their failed strategy of alienating the GOP's huge Pro-Life base?” asked NJRTL-PAC Public & Legislative Affairs Director Marie Tasy.

Tasy noted that since the election, Forrester has been roundly criticized by the same pro-abortion Republicans who proudly ‘stood by their man’ until the polls closed and the votes were counted.” “Before the disastrous loss, not one word of dissent was uttered by any Republican pro-abortion group or individual indicating displeasure with Forrester’s abortion position.” “Since November 5th, pro-abortion Republicans including Christie Whitman, Hazel Gluck, Roger Bodman, and the fringe pro-abortion group who endorsed Forrester (the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition) have all done a complete about-face and are now whining that Forrester lost because he was not pro-abortion enough. That’s just intellectually dishonest,” said Tasy. “It’s obvious that this faction is in damage control mode and will go to any length to perpetuate their self-serving agenda, even if it means continued losses for the NJ GOP.” Tasy said that some have even gone so far as to erroneously imply that pro-abortion Republicans fare better in statewide races than conservative Republicans. “If the assertion that only pro-abortion republicans can win statewide were correct, Forrester would have beaten Frank Lautenberg, Bob Franks would have beaten Jon Corzine in 2000, and Dick Zimmer would have beaten Bob Torricelli in 1996. The last time I checked, none of these men held a seat in the U. S. Senate,” noted Tasy.

In fact, an analysis of the last 3 NJ U. S. Senate races show the following: In 1996, pro-abortion Democrat Bob Torricelli beat pro-abortion Republican Dick Zimmer by 291,803 votes; in 2000, pro-abortion Democrat Jon Corzine beat pro-abortion Republican Bob Franks by approximately 90,000 votes; and in 2002, pro-abortion Republican Frank Lautenberg beat pro-abortion Republican Doug Forrester by 201,914 votes.

An interesting footnote not to be overlooked is that during the 2001 gubernatorial race, Pro-Life Republican Bret Schundler actually garnered several thousand more total votes than U. S. Senate Candidate Doug Forrester one year later.

“NJRTL-PAC is deeply gratified that of the 6 Republicans in the NJ congressional delegation, 5 are supported by NJRTL-PAC and can be counted on to support President Bush’s agenda,” said Tasy. “They are Frank LoBiondo, Jim Saxton, Chris Smith, Mike Ferguson and Congressman-elect Scott Garrett, the only Pro-Life Republican running in Bergen County and the only Republican to win a race in Bergen County.”

“Additionally, 4 of the 5 Republican U.S. Senate candidates who received financial support from NJRTL-PAC won on November 5th. They are Wayne Allard (R-CO), Norm Coleman (R-MN), John Cornyn (R-TX), and Jim Talent (R-MO). NJRTL-PAC also financially supported John Thune from South Dakota, who is now facing a recount because of the closeness of the final election results.”

Along with Forrester, the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition supported other big losers in NJ on November 5th. While Pro-Life Republican Assemblyman Scott Garrett easily won a landslide victory in the 5th Congressional district, pro-abortion Republican Buster Soaries lost by 20 points in what some say should have been a GOP pick-up. Also, pro-abortion Republican activist Candace Straight lost by an embarrassing margin in the Essex County Executive race.

“As the NJ legislative races draw closer and GOP leaders focus on retaking the State Senate majority, it is important for the NJ GOP to abandon the failed formulas and bad advice of the past,” contended Tasy. “The NJ GOP must give Pro-Life voters a reason to pull the lever for Republicans,” she said. “The Pro-Life vote can no longer be taken for granted; just ask Senators Zimmer, Franks, and Forrester.” “Hopefully, the NJ Republican Party will learn its lesson. If not, there will be even more disastrous election nights in the future for the NJ GOP.”

Anti-Gun Agenda Cost Candidates their Seats in the House and Senate
A Key Factor on Election Day
Socialsecurity.org
Who Won?

106 posted on 11/11/2002 6:58:46 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coleus
Coleus,

Thanks for the ping.
BUMP for great freeping.

Regards,
LH
107 posted on 11/11/2002 7:57:07 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
I have been meaning to Freepmail you I now currently live here in New Jersey to answer your question. Anyway I tend to believe that if the Republicans stress their new ideas Social Security Reform, Medical Savings accounts, School Vouchers etc they will do extremely well at the polls from here on out. As for the Abortion issue in New Jersey our guy got boxed in, or caught on the ropes if you will, I believe the Democrats succeeded in presenting conservatism to the swing voters as something archaic and obsolete. As for a canidate who could win and how to do that I have not figured that one out yet.
112 posted on 11/12/2002 4:33:04 PM PST by peter the great
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson