Oooooh! Fewer abortions! SOUND THE ALARM!!!!!
1 posted on
11/07/2002 2:21:11 PM PST by
GeneD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: GeneD
``Roe v. Wade hangs by a single vote,'' said Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women. ``Tipping the balance of the Supreme Court with one more extremist justice would ensure the loss of abortion rights for generations.'' That's B.S. Overturning Roe v. Wade will just kick it down to each individual state to decide.
BTW, if abortion is a supposed to be "a decision between a woman and her doctor," as these women keep endlessly harping, then taxpayers shouldn't be funding this or any other so-called 'private choice'. You don't see the government paying for people to smoke, do you?
Planned Parenthood and NOW are just alarmed that the gravy train is stopping and they're going to be losing big bucks.
To: GeneD
ITS NOT JUST FEWER ABORTIONS ITS FEWER MINORTY BABIES THEY WANT.THE PEOPLE WHO WORK PLANNED PARENTHOOD KNOW PP IS RACIST THATS WHY THEY ARE TERRIFIED WHEN PROLIFERS BRING IT UP...
73 posted on
11/07/2002 8:17:03 PM PST by
fishbabe
To: GeneD
Ummm, I hope the GOP doesn't use this victory to restrict abortions too much: to do so will guarantee a democrat takeover in two years. It would take the GOP ten years to fix the damage caused by such a move. There are too mnay independents and republicans who support abortion. As O'Reilly says, where am I wrong?
To: GeneD
It is not the law that Roe v. Wade generated that is at risk, but the absolute right to abortion. This was contained in Sarah Weddington's brief but rejected by the Court in 1972. Subsequently, however, the radical view prevailed, and this is what we are stuck with now: the most radical abortion law in the Western world but in a country that is very uneasy with it. The comparison with the United States in 1861 and its attitude toward slavery at that time is very close.
87 posted on
11/07/2002 10:30:27 PM PST by
RobbyS
To: GeneD
``Roe v. Wade hangs by a single vote,'' said Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women. ``Tipping the balance of the Supreme Court with one more extremist justice would ensure the loss of abortion rights for generations.'' Huh, that close, huh? Well, what are we waiting for? Let's push that sucker into the dung heap of history, where it belongs.
91 posted on
11/07/2002 11:35:31 PM PST by
Slyfox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson