[Technogeeb]

On that one item you have shown that dishonesty knows no bounds. That is but one of several statements you put forth that has been stricken from the record of your accumulated degree of dishonesty over several posts

If I had really made any false statements, you would have been gleefully reposting them as you are my (accurate, but which you still pretend is false) statement about the ability of the bureaucracy to use the proposed legislation as an instrument to implement communism. But since you fail to post such supposedly "false" statement (and now admit that the flaw you so long insisted didn't exist is indeed a flaw), you are left with nothing but personal attacks. Unlike my honesty, you really have posted lies. Even ignoring the lies you have posted about me, you have posted lies where you insist that the HHS is an "honest" department. And when those lies are disproven, you insist that they were merely "errors" while continuing to use them and other invalid personal attacks.

The accumulation is much more than just that one need for a law that prohibits the HHS from putting out a dishonest poverty level number. Which it wasn't until I mentioned a the possibility that it entered your thinking that a law could thwart that possibility

I already proposed a solution to that issue (elimination of the "prebate" in favor of making some items tax exempt). There are dozens of other potential solutions. But before I could propose a solution, I had to make you realize that the problem really did exist, something that you refused to do because of your stupid blind faith in government (i.e., that the HHS would be "honest" when it is well kwown that they have been anything but honest in determining the value of the poverty level).

If I'm wrong and you did think of it earlier but chose not to mention it probably because to mention it would thwart your agenda

Proposing a solution to the flaw would have been futile until you realized that the flaw existed. My "agenda" is simply to resist the implementation of a tax code that is even more socialistic than the current abomination.

which I have no doubt you have not honestly stated

That's because you are being foolish. By believing that anyone who simply points out flaws in your system is intent on destroying the underlying principles of that system, you will alienate much of the support which would otherwise flock to your cause. When someone points out flaws in your system, rather than simply correcting them to create an even superior system you instead assume that the person pointing out the flaws is an "enemy". Your simplistic, one-dimensional thinking is a greater threat to the cause of a NRST replacement to the income tax than the chimera of enemies you perceive.

[Zon]

If I had really made any false statements, you would have been gleefully reposting them

No. You're wrong again. I have confidence in the reader that they can read our posts, comprehend, think and decide for themselves via juxtaposition whose being honest and who's not.

(and now admit that the flaw you so long insisted didn't exist is indeed a flaw),

BTW, In light of information recently posted to this thread at post 962 and 969 showing that it is not a flaw I have moved your $150,000 HHS poverty level assertion back to where it belongs in the tinfoil-hat section and also placed that back with your accumulated dishonesties. This little ditty of yours has come full circle and is subsumed in the honesty versus dishonesty matrix which our back-and-forth created.